Accounting for uncertainty when mapping species distributions: The need for maps of ignorance

被引:315
作者
Rocchini, Duccio
Hortal, Joaquin [1 ]
Lengyel, Szabolcs [2 ]
Lobo, Jorge M.
Jimenez-Valverde, Alberto [3 ]
Ricotta, Carlo [4 ]
Bacaro, Giovanni [5 ]
Chiarucci, Alessandro [5 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, London, England
[2] Univ Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
[3] Univ Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[4] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Siena, I-53100 Siena, Italy
来源
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT | 2011年 / 35卷 / 02期
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 匈牙利科学研究基金会;
关键词
biodiversity; biogeography; conservation; macroecology; species distribution maps; species distribution modelling; uncertainty; BUTTERFLY DISTRIBUTION MAPS; DISTRIBUTION MODELS; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; RANGE MAPS; TAXONOMIC INFLATION; IMPROVE PREDICTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SAMPLE-SIZE; BIAS; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1177/0309133311399491
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Accurate mapping of species distributions is a fundamental goal of modern biogeography, both for basic and applied purposes. This is commonly done by plotting known species occurrences, expert-drawn range maps or geographical estimations derived from species distribution models. However, all three kinds of maps are implicitly subject to uncertainty, due to the quality and bias of raw distributional data, the process of map building, and the dynamic nature of species distributions themselves. Here we review the main sources of uncertainty suggesting a code of good practices in order to minimize their effects. Specifically, we claim that uncertainty should be always explicitly taken into account and we propose the creation of maps of ignorance to provide information on where the mapped distributions are reliable and where they are uncertain.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 226
页数:16
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Models for ecological data: an introduction
[2]   Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Whittaker, RJ ;
Ladle, RJ ;
Erhard, M .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2005, 14 (06) :529-538
[3]   Ensemble forecasting of species distributions [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
New, Mark .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (01) :42-47
[4]   Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
Guisan, Antoine .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2006, 33 (10) :1677-1688
[5]   Error propagation modelling in raster GIS: Overlay operations [J].
Arbia, G ;
Griffith, D ;
Haining, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1998, 12 (02) :145-167
[6]  
Arino A, 2008, P TDWG
[7]   Using taxonomic data to assess and monitor biodiversity: are the tribes still fighting? [J].
Bacaro, Giovanni ;
Baragatti, Elisa ;
Chiarucci, Alessandro .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2009, 11 (04) :798-801
[8]   Multi-stage cluster sampling for estimating average species richness at different spatial grains [J].
Baffetta, F. ;
Bacaro, G. ;
Fattorini, L. ;
Rocchini, D. ;
Chiarucci, A. .
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY, 2007, 8 (01) :119-127
[9]   Assessing alpha and beta taxonomy in eupelmid wasps: determinants of the probability of describing good species and synonyms [J].
Baselga, A. ;
Lobo, J. M. ;
Hortal, J. ;
Jimenez-Valverde, A. ;
Gomez, J. F. .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (01) :40-49
[10]   Which leaf beetles have not yet been described?: Determinants of the description of western Palaearctic Aphthona species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) [J].
Baselga, Andres ;
Hortal, Joaquin ;
Jimenez-Valverde, Alberto ;
Gomez, Jose F. ;
Lobo, Jorge M. .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2007, 16 (05) :1409-1421