Effects of the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil Versus Olmesartan and Valsartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stages 1 and 2 Hypertension

被引:177
作者
White, William B. [1 ]
Weber, Michael A. [2 ]
Sica, Domenic [3 ]
Bakris, George L. [4 ]
Perez, Alfonso [5 ]
Cao, Charlie [5 ]
Kupfer, Stuart [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Div Hypertens & Clin Pharmacol, Calhoun Cardiol Ctr, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[2] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Takeda Global Res & Dev, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; angiotensin receptor blockers; azilsartan medoxomil; clinical trial; olmesartan; valsartan; LONG-TERM REPRODUCIBILITY; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; LOSARTAN; HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; TELMISARTAN; COMBINATION; REDUCTION; MORTALITY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Azilsartan medoxomil is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) being developed for hypertension treatment. To compare this ARB with others in the class, we studied the effects of 2 doses of azilsartan medoxomil, with valsartan 320 mg and olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan) 40 mg, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and clinic BP measurements. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in 24-hour mean systolic BP. Hierarchical analysis testing for superiority over placebo was followed by noninferiority analysis and then superiority testing of azilsartan medoxomil (80 mg and then 40 mg) versus the comparator ARBs. For 1291 randomized patients, mean age was 56 years, 54% were men, and baseline 24-hour mean systolic BP was 145 mm Hg. Azilsartan medoxomil at 80 mg had superior efficacy to both valsartan at 320 mg and olmesartan at 40 mg: placebo-adjusted 24-hour systolic BP was lowered (-14.3 mm Hg) more than 320 mg of valsartan (-10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and 40 mg of olmesartan (-11.7 mm Hg; P=0.009). Azilsartan medoxomil at 40 mg was noninferior to 40 mg of olmesartan (difference: -1.4 mm Hg [95% CI: -3.3 to 0.5]). For clinic systolic BP, both doses of azilsartan medoxomil were superior to the comparator ARBs. Safety and tolerability were similar among the placebo and 4 active treatments. These data demonstrate that azilsartan medoxomil at its maximal dose has superior efficacy to both olmesartan and valsartan at their maximal, approved doses without increasing adverse events. Azilsartan medoxomil could provide higher rates of hypertension control within the ARB class. (Hypertension. 2011;57:413-420.). Online Data Supplement
引用
收藏
页码:413 / U150
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Wang, Ji-Guang
    Zhang, Miao
    Feng, Ying-Qing
    Ma, Chang-Sheng
    Wang, Tzung-Dau
    Zhu, Zhi-Ming
    Kario, Kazuomi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2021, 23 (05) : 901 - 914
  • [32] Effects of valsartan with or without benazepril on blood pressure, angiotensin II, and endoxin in patients with essential hypertension
    Ke, YS
    Tao, YY
    Yang, H
    Yu, GH
    ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA, 2003, 24 (04) : 337 - 341
  • [33] Administration time-dependent effects of valsartan on ambulatory blood pressure in nondipper patients with grade 1-2 essential hypertension
    Hermida, RC
    Calvo, C
    Ayala, DE
    Dominguez, MJ
    Covelo, M
    Mojon, A
    Fernandez, JR
    Lopez, JE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 17 (05) : 111A - 111A
  • [34] Effects of morning versus evening administration of valsartan on ambulatory blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients
    Calvo, C
    Hermida, RC
    Ayala, DE
    Lopez, JE
    Dominguez, MJ
    Covelo, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 17 (05) : 109A - 110A
  • [35] Antiproteinuric effects of angiotensin receptor blockers:: telmisartan versus valsartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and overt nephropathy
    Galle, Jan
    Schwedhelm, Edzard
    Pinnetti, Sabine
    Boeger, Rainer H.
    Wanner, Christoph
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 23 (10) : 3174 - 3183
  • [36] Antihypertensive, insulin-sensitising and renoprotective effects of a novel, potent and long-acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, azilsartan medoxomil, in rat and dog models
    Kusumoto, Keiji
    Igata, Hideki
    Ojima, Mami
    Tsuboi, Ayako
    Imanishi, Mitsuaki
    Yamaguchi, Fuminari
    Sakamoto, Hiroki
    Kuroita, Takanobu
    Kawaguchi, Naohiro
    Nishigaki, Nobuhiro
    Nagaya, Hideaki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 669 (1-3) : 84 - 93
  • [37] Once-daily effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker, eprosartan on 24-hour blood pressure in patients with systemic hypertension.
    White, WB
    Anwar, YA
    Sica, DA
    Dubb, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1999, 12 (04) : 27A - 27A
  • [38] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Forced-Titration Study to Compare Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Losartan Potassium in Patients with Stage 1 and 2 Hypertension
    Weir, Matthew R.
    Punzi, Henry A.
    Flack, John M.
    Stoakes, Kathy A.
    Chavanu, Kathleen J.
    Li, Wei
    Dubiel, Robert
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2011, 123 (01) : 80 - 87
  • [39] Olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) reduces blood pressure (BP) load and improves goal rates more effectively than losartan potassium (LOS) and valsartan (VAL) in patients with essential hypertension
    Neutel, J
    Lee, Y
    Silfani, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (05) : 70A - 70A
  • [40] Effects of valsartan monotherapy on the circadian blood pressure profile of patients with grade 1-2 essential hypertension
    Hermida, RC
    Calvo, C
    Ayala, DE
    Dominguez, MJ
    Covelo, M
    Mojon, A
    Fernandez, JR
    Lopez, JE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 17 (05) : 110A - 110A