Effects of the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil Versus Olmesartan and Valsartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stages 1 and 2 Hypertension

被引:178
作者
White, William B. [1 ]
Weber, Michael A. [2 ]
Sica, Domenic [3 ]
Bakris, George L. [4 ]
Perez, Alfonso [5 ]
Cao, Charlie [5 ]
Kupfer, Stuart [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Div Hypertens & Clin Pharmacol, Calhoun Cardiol Ctr, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[2] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Takeda Global Res & Dev, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; angiotensin receptor blockers; azilsartan medoxomil; clinical trial; olmesartan; valsartan; LONG-TERM REPRODUCIBILITY; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; LOSARTAN; HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; TELMISARTAN; COMBINATION; REDUCTION; MORTALITY; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163402
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Azilsartan medoxomil is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) being developed for hypertension treatment. To compare this ARB with others in the class, we studied the effects of 2 doses of azilsartan medoxomil, with valsartan 320 mg and olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan) 40 mg, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and clinic BP measurements. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in 24-hour mean systolic BP. Hierarchical analysis testing for superiority over placebo was followed by noninferiority analysis and then superiority testing of azilsartan medoxomil (80 mg and then 40 mg) versus the comparator ARBs. For 1291 randomized patients, mean age was 56 years, 54% were men, and baseline 24-hour mean systolic BP was 145 mm Hg. Azilsartan medoxomil at 80 mg had superior efficacy to both valsartan at 320 mg and olmesartan at 40 mg: placebo-adjusted 24-hour systolic BP was lowered (-14.3 mm Hg) more than 320 mg of valsartan (-10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and 40 mg of olmesartan (-11.7 mm Hg; P=0.009). Azilsartan medoxomil at 40 mg was noninferior to 40 mg of olmesartan (difference: -1.4 mm Hg [95% CI: -3.3 to 0.5]). For clinic systolic BP, both doses of azilsartan medoxomil were superior to the comparator ARBs. Safety and tolerability were similar among the placebo and 4 active treatments. These data demonstrate that azilsartan medoxomil at its maximal dose has superior efficacy to both olmesartan and valsartan at their maximal, approved doses without increasing adverse events. Azilsartan medoxomil could provide higher rates of hypertension control within the ARB class. (Hypertension. 2011;57:413-420.). Online Data Supplement
引用
收藏
页码:413 / U150
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   CLINICAL-VALUE OF AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING [J].
MANCIA, G ;
OMBONI, S ;
PARATI, G ;
SANTUCCIU, C ;
TRAZZI, S ;
ULIAN, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1993, 6 (03) :S9-S13
[12]  
MANSOOR GA, 1994, J HYPERTENS, V12, P703
[13]   Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial [J].
McGill, JB ;
Reilly, PA .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (06) :833-850
[14]   APPLICATION OF AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING IN DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS [J].
NEUTEL, JM ;
SMITH, DHG ;
RAM, CVS ;
KAPLAN, NM ;
PAPADEMETRIOU, V ;
FAGAN, TC ;
LEFKOWITZ, MP ;
KAZEMPOUR, MK ;
WEBER, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 94 (02) :181-187
[15]  
Ram CVS, 2009, CURR MED RES OPIN, V25, P177, DOI [10.1185/03007990802597456, 10.1185/03007990802597456 ]
[16]  
RUDDY MC, 2000, HYPERTENSION, P621
[17]   Dose-response characteristics of olmesartan medoxomil and other angiotensin receptor antagonists [J].
Smith, David H. G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2007, 7 (05) :347-356
[18]   Comparison of telmisartan versus losartan: meta-analysis of titration-to-response studies [J].
Smith, DHG ;
Cramer, MJM ;
Neutel, JM ;
Hettiarachchi, R ;
Koval, S .
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2003, 8 (03) :111-117
[19]   Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis [J].
Staessen, JA ;
Wang, YG ;
Thijs, L .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9290) :1305-1315
[20]   Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension [J].
Staessen, JA ;
Thijs, L ;
Fagard, R ;
O'Brien, ET ;
Clement, D ;
de Leeuw, PW ;
Mancia, G ;
Nachev, C ;
Palatini, P ;
Parati, G ;
Tuomilehto, J ;
Webster, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (06) :539-546