Quality indicators used by trauma centers for performance measurement

被引:33
作者
Santana, Maria Jose [1 ,3 ]
Stelfox, Henry T. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Res & Innovat Ctr W21C, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Crit Care Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Med & Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Quality indicators; audit filters; trauma care; trauma centers; CARE; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e318246584c
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: To describe the quality indicators (QIs) that trauma centers use for quality measurement and performance improvement. Measuring and reporting quality of care is a critical step to improve the quality of care. QIs compare actual trauma care against ideal criteria and identify patients in whom care may have been suboptimal and should be further reviewed. METHODS: Three hundred thirty verified trauma centers in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand had their websites reviewed and leadership surveyed regarding QI use. The indicators identified were classified according to definition specifications, phase of care, Institute of Medicine aims, and contents. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one centers responded to the survey (76%) and the majority (97%) indicated that they use QIs. We obtained 10,587 QIs from 262 centers (survey responses and website review) of which 1,102 were unique indicators. The QIs primarily assessed the safety (49%), effectiveness (32%), efficiency (27%), and timeliness (22%) of hospital processes (64%) and outcomes (24%). The majority of indicators were used by a small number of centers (551 of 1,102 unique indicators used by single centers). CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first description of the QIs used by verified trauma centers in four high-income countries with similar systems of trauma care. The majority of trauma centers measure QIs designed to examine the safety, effectiveness, efficiency, and timeliness of hospital processes and outcomes. Opportunities exist to standardize existing QIs to allow broader implementation and develop new QIs to examine patient-centered care and equality of care. (J Trauma. 2012;72: 1298-1303. Copyright (C) 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)
引用
收藏
页码:1298 / 1302
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]   National inventory of hospital trauma centers [J].
MacKenzie, EJ ;
Hoyt, DB ;
Sacra, JC ;
Jurkovich, GJ ;
Carlini, AR ;
Teitelbaum, SD ;
Teter, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (12) :1515-1522
[12]  
Maier RV, 2001, INJURY CONTROL, P236
[13]  
McGlynn EA, 2003, MED CARE, V41, pI39
[14]   From a process of care to a measure: the development and testing of a quality indicator [J].
Rubin, HR ;
Pronovost, P ;
Diette, GB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 13 (06) :489-496
[15]   ASSURING QUALITY IN A TRAUMA SYSTEM - THE MEDICAL AUDIT COMMITTEE - COMPOSITION, COST, AND RESULTS [J].
SHACKFORD, SR ;
HOLLINGSWORTHFRIDLUND, P ;
MCARDLE, M ;
EASTMAN, AB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1987, 27 (08) :866-875
[16]   Evidence for quality indicators to evaluate adult trauma care: A systematic review [J].
Stelfox, Henry T. ;
Straus, Sharon E. ;
Nathens, Avery ;
Bobranska-Artiuch, Barbara .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (04) :846-859
[17]   Quality Indicators for Evaluating Trauma Care A Scoping Review [J].
Stelfox, Henry Thomas ;
Bobranska-Artiuch, Barbara ;
Nathens, Avery ;
Straus, Sharon E. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 145 (03) :286-295
[18]   Interpreting process indicators in trauma care: Construct validity versus confounding by indication [J].
Willis, Cameron D. ;
Stoelwinder, Johannes U. ;
Cameron, Peter A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 20 (05) :331-338
[19]   Measuring quality in trauma care [J].
Willis, Cameron D. ;
Gabbe, Belinda J. ;
Cameron, Peter A. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2007, 38 (05) :527-537