Quality indicators used by trauma centers for performance measurement

被引:33
作者
Santana, Maria Jose [1 ,3 ]
Stelfox, Henry T. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Res & Innovat Ctr W21C, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Crit Care Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Med & Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Quality indicators; audit filters; trauma care; trauma centers; CARE; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e318246584c
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: To describe the quality indicators (QIs) that trauma centers use for quality measurement and performance improvement. Measuring and reporting quality of care is a critical step to improve the quality of care. QIs compare actual trauma care against ideal criteria and identify patients in whom care may have been suboptimal and should be further reviewed. METHODS: Three hundred thirty verified trauma centers in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand had their websites reviewed and leadership surveyed regarding QI use. The indicators identified were classified according to definition specifications, phase of care, Institute of Medicine aims, and contents. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one centers responded to the survey (76%) and the majority (97%) indicated that they use QIs. We obtained 10,587 QIs from 262 centers (survey responses and website review) of which 1,102 were unique indicators. The QIs primarily assessed the safety (49%), effectiveness (32%), efficiency (27%), and timeliness (22%) of hospital processes (64%) and outcomes (24%). The majority of indicators were used by a small number of centers (551 of 1,102 unique indicators used by single centers). CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first description of the QIs used by verified trauma centers in four high-income countries with similar systems of trauma care. The majority of trauma centers measure QIs designed to examine the safety, effectiveness, efficiency, and timeliness of hospital processes and outcomes. Opportunities exist to standardize existing QIs to allow broader implementation and develop new QIs to examine patient-centered care and equality of care. (J Trauma. 2012;72: 1298-1303. Copyright (C) 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)
引用
收藏
页码:1298 / 1302
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AHRQ QUAL IND PROJ N
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
[3]   Is unplanned return to the operating room a useful quality indicator in general surgery? [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Hamby, LS ;
Birkmeyer, CM ;
Decker, MV ;
Karon, NM ;
Dow, RW .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (04) :405-409
[4]   The trauma registry as a statewide quality improvement tool [J].
Cameron, PA ;
Gabbe, BJ ;
McNeil, JJ ;
Finch, CF ;
Smith, KL ;
Cooper, J ;
Judson, R ;
Kossmann, T .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 59 (06) :1469-1476
[5]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CRITICAL CARE ERRORS IN CAUSING PREVENTABLE DEATH IN TRAUMA PATIENTS IN A TRAUMA SYSTEM [J].
DAVIS, JW ;
HOYT, DB ;
MCARDLE, MS ;
MACKERSIE, RC ;
SHACKFORD, SR ;
EASTMAN, AB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1991, 31 (06) :813-819
[7]  
Evans C, 2009, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V7
[8]   Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality - Lessons learned from 2594 deaths [J].
Gruen, Russell L. ;
Jurkovich, Gregory J. ;
McIntyre, Lisa K. ;
Foy, Hugh M. ;
Maier, Ronald V. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 244 (03) :371-380
[9]   The Trauma Quality Improvement Program: Pilot Study and Initial Demonstration of Feasibility [J].
Hemmila, Mark R. ;
Nathens, Avery B. ;
Shafi, Shahid ;
Calland, J. Forrest ;
Clark, David E. ;
Cryer, H. Gill ;
Goble, Sandra ;
Hoeft, Christopher J. ;
Meredith, J. Wayne ;
Neal, Melanie L. ;
Pasquale, Michael D. ;
Pomphrey, Michelle D. ;
Fildes, John J. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 68 (02) :253-261
[10]  
Lohr K N, 1992, QRB Qual Rev Bull, V18, P120