Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis

被引:28
作者
Rhodes, TL
McCoy, TP
Higdon, HL
Boone, WR
机构
[1] Greenville Hosp Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Greenville, SC USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Math, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; ART; embryo transfer; pregnancy rates;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-005-6794-1
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose : To determine factors instrumental in achieving a clinical pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology (ART) patients. Methods : This study included 205 women undergoing their first ART cycle. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for patient demographics, in vitro production data, and factors associated with embryo transfer. Odds ratios (OR) were performed where appropriate. Results : Our analyses indicated that age (OR: 0.879), specific year in which the cycle was performed (OR: 2.959), and use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (OR: 2.867) altered potential pregnancy rate. In addition, percent fertilization (OR: 1.028), number of embryos transferred (OR: 1.842), type of catheter used to transfer the embryos (OR: 0.377), presence of blood on the catheter (OR .414), and embryologist (OR: 2.338) also altered pregnancy rate. Conclusions : Our data indicate patients' age, use of the Cook catheter, and presence of blood on the catheter reduce pregnancy rates. Performing ART in 1999, using ICSI, increasing fertilization rate, increasing number of embryos transferred (albeit less desirable when the chance of multiple gestation may occur), and transferring embryos via a particular embryologist, improve pregnancy rates.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 346
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
*AM SOC REPR MED, 1999, PRACT COMM REP COMM
[2]  
Barber D, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P105
[3]   A uterine ultrasonographic scoring system as a method for the prognosis of embryo implantation [J].
Baruffi, RLR ;
Contart, P ;
Mauri, AL ;
Petersen, C ;
Felipe, V ;
Garbellini, E ;
Franco, JG .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2002, 19 (03) :99-102
[4]   Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory [J].
Boone, WR ;
Johnson, JE ;
Locke, AJ ;
Crane, MM ;
Price, TM .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (01) :150-154
[5]   Cook versus Edwards-Wallace: Are there differences in flexible catheters? [J].
Boone, WR ;
Johnson, JE ;
Blackhurst, DM ;
Crane, MM .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2001, 18 (01) :15-17
[6]   Predictors of success after embryo transfer: Experience from a single provider [J].
Burke, LM ;
Davenport, AT ;
Russell, GB ;
Deaton, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1001-1004
[7]  
*CDCP, 2002 ASS REPR TECHN
[8]   Assisted hatching increases the implantation and pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer (ET), but not that of IVF-tubal ET in patients with repeated IVF failures [J].
Chao, KH ;
Chen, SU ;
Chen, HF ;
Wu, MY ;
Yang, YS ;
Ho, HN .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1997, 67 (05) :904-908
[9]   Is there any difference in pregnancy and implantation rates when nurses perform embryo transfer in an IVF-ET program? [J].
Cheung, WM ;
Ng, EHY ;
Lau, EYL ;
Yeung, WSB ;
So, WWK ;
Ho, PC .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2003, 56 (01) :1-5
[10]  
COHEN J, 1989, FERTIL STERIL, V51, P820