Analysis of a multilevel Markov chain Monte Carlo finite element method for Bayesian inversion of log-normal diffusions

被引:8
作者
Viet Ha Hoang [1 ]
Quek, Jia Hao [1 ]
Schwab, Christoph [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Phys & Math Sci, Div Math Sci, Singapore 637371, Singapore
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Math, Seminar Appl Math, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Bayesian inverse problems; log-normal coefficient; Gaussian prior; multilevel Markov chain Monte Carlo; optimal complexity; finite element approximation; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION; ALGORITHM; EQUATIONS; MCMC;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6420/ab2a1e
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
We develop the multilevel Markov chain Monte Carlo finite element method (MLMCMC-FEM) to sample from the posterior density of the Bayesian inverse problems. The unknown is the diffusion coefficient of a linear, second-order divergence form, elliptic equation in a bounded, polytopal subdomain of R-d. We provide a convergence analysis with absolute mean convergence rate estimates for the proposed modified MLMCMC-FEM showing in particular error versus work bounds, which are explicit in the discretization parameters. This work generalizes the MLMCMC-FEM algorithm and the error versus work analysis for the uniform prior measure from Hoang et al (2013 Inverse Problems 29), which we also review here, to linear, elliptic, divergence-form PDEs with a log-Gaussian uncertain coefficient and Gaussian prior measure. In comparison to Hoang et al (2013 Inverse Problems 29), we show by mathematical proofs and numerical examples that the unboundedness of the parameter range under Gaussian prior and the non-uniform ellipticity of the forward model require essential modifications in the MCMC sampling algorithm and in the error analysis. The proposed novel multilevel MCMC sampler applies to general Bayesian inverse problems for linear, second order elliptic divergence-form PDEs with log-Gaussian coefficients. It only requires a numerical forward solver with essentially optimal complexity for producing an approximation of the posterior expectation of a quantity of interest within a prescribed accuracy. Numerical examples using independence and pCN samplers are in agreement with our error versus work analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:46
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, GAUSSIAN MEASURES
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, MARKOV CHAINS STOCHA
  • [3] Multilevel Sequential Monte Carlo with Dimension-Independent Likelihood-Informed Proposals
    Beskos, Alexandros
    Jasra, Ajay
    Law, Kody
    Marzouk, Youssef
    Zhou, Yan
    [J]. SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2018, 6 (02): : 762 - 786
  • [4] Multilevel sequential Monte Carlo samplers
    Beskos, Alexandros
    Jasra, Ajay
    Law, Kody
    Tempone, Raul
    Zhou, Yan
    [J]. STOCHASTIC PROCESSES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2017, 127 (05) : 1417 - 1440
  • [5] Geometric MCMC for infinite-dimensional inverse problems
    Beskos, Alexandros
    Girolami, Mark
    Lan, Shiwei
    Farrell, Patrick E.
    Stuart, Andrew M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2017, 335 : 327 - 351
  • [6] ON THE CONVERGENCE OF ADAPTIVE SEQUENTIAL MONTE CARLO METHODS
    Beskos, Alexandros
    Jasra, Ajay
    Kantas, Nikolas
    Thiery, Alexandre
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2016, 26 (02) : 1111 - 1146
  • [7] Sequential Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian elliptic inverse problems
    Beskos, Alexandros
    Jasra, Ajay
    Muzaffer, Ege A.
    Stuart, Andrew M.
    [J]. STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2015, 25 (04) : 727 - 737
  • [8] STRONG AND WEAK ERROR ESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH RANDOM COEFFICIENTS
    Charrier, Julia
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 50 (01) : 216 - 246
  • [9] Bayesian inverse problems for functions and applications to fluid mechanics
    Cotter, S. L.
    Dashti, M.
    Robinson, J. C.
    Stuart, A. M.
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2009, 25 (11)
  • [10] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND WEAK APPROXIMATION OF AN ELLIPTIC INVERSE PROBLEM
    Dashti, M.
    Stuart, A. M.
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 49 (06) : 2524 - 2542