What drives renewable energy development?

被引:90
作者
Alagappan, L. [1 ]
Orans, R. [1 ]
Woo, C. K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Energy & Environm Econ Inc, San Francisco, CA 94104 USA
[2] Baptist Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong Energy Studies Ctr, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Renewable energy development; Transmission planning; Interconnection cost; ELECTRICITY MARKET; WIND GENERATION; TRANSMISSION; OBLIGATION; EXPERIENCE; GERMANY; ENGLAND; PRICES; WALES; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This viewpoint reviews renewable energy development in 14 markets that differ in market structure (restructured vs. not restructured), use of feed-in-tariff (FIT) (yes vs. no), transmission planning (anticipatory vs. reactive), and transmission interconnection cost allocated to a renewable generator (high vs. low). We find that market restructuring is not a primary driver of renewable energy development. Renewable generation has the highest percent of total installed capacity in markets that use a FIT, employ anticipatory transmission planning, and have loads or end-users paying for most, if not all, of the transmission interconnection costs. In contrast, renewable developers have been less successful in markets that do not use a FIT, employ reactive transmission planning, and have generators paying for most, if not all, of the transmission interconnection costs. While these policies can lead to higher penetration of renewable energy in the short run, their high cost to ratepayers can threaten the economic sustainability of renewable energy in the long-run. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5099 / 5104
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, ELECT MARKET REFORM
  • [2] Planning for big things in Brazil
    Barroso, Luiz A.
    Porrua, Fernando
    Thome, Luiz M.
    Pereira, Mario V.
    [J]. IEEE POWER & ENERGY MAGAZINE, 2007, 5 (05): : 54 - 63
  • [3] *FERC, 1996, ORD 888
  • [4] FRAIAS JDD, 2010, COMMUNICATION 0624
  • [5] Haas R, 2008, PROMOTING ELECT RENE
  • [6] Assessment of the global and regional geographical, technical and economic potential of onshore wind energy
    Hoogwijk, M
    de Vries, B
    Turkenburg, W
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (05) : 889 - 919
  • [7] *HQT, 2010, OP ACC TRANSM TAR
  • [8] A survey of transmission tariffs in North America
    Lusztig, C
    Feldberg, P
    Orans, R
    Olson, A
    [J]. ENERGY, 2006, 31 (6-7) : 1017 - 1039
  • [9] Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany
    Mitchell, C
    Bauknecht, D
    Connor, PM
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (03) : 297 - 305
  • [10] Market design for a large share of wind power
    Newbery, David
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) : 3131 - 3134