Structured Principal Component Analysis Model With Variable Correlation Constraint

被引:18
作者
Zhai, Ruikun [1 ]
Zeng, Jiusun [2 ]
Ge, Zhiqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Control Sci & Engn, Inst Ind Proc Control, State Key Lab Ind Control Technol, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
[2] China Jiliang Univ, Coll Metrol & Measurement Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Principal component analysis; Sparse matrices; Computational modeling; Analytical models; Data models; Reliability; Process monitoring; Accelerated proximal gradient descent (APGD); elastic net regression; Laplace sparse principal component analysis (PCA); model interpretability; model reliability; MACHINE;
D O I
10.1109/TCST.2021.3069539
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a widely used technique in process monitoring, fault diagnosis, and soft sensing of industrial systems. Despite its popularity, PCA suffers from the limitations of poor interpretability and robustness. In order to improve the PCA model, this article considers a structured sparse method--Laplace sparse principal component analysis (LSPCA), by integrating domain knowledge and sparsity constraint in the form of Laplace matrix and elastic net regularization constraint. Different from previous work, this article focuses on the advantages brought by the Laplace matrix and sparsity constraint on revealing the true latent process structure. When variable correlations are known in advance, the Laplace matrix can help extract sparse principal components that are consistent with the variable correlations. The increased accuracy of extracted latent process structure enhances the capability of PCA in soft sensing. The performance of the proposed method is verified by a simulation example and an application study to a distillation process.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 569
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
    Beck, Amir
    Teboulle, Marc
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON IMAGING SCIENCES, 2009, 2 (01): : 183 - 202
  • [2] All sparse PCA models are wrong, but some are useful. Part I: Computation of scores, residuals and explained variance
    Camacho, J.
    Smilde, A. K.
    Saccenti, E.
    Westerhuis, J. A.
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2020, 196 (196)
  • [3] Hierarchical Bayesian Network Modeling Framework for Large-Scale Process Monitoring and Decision Making
    Chen, Guangjie
    Ge, Zhiqiang
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 28 (02) : 671 - 679
  • [4] Grey-box radial basis function modelling
    Chen, Sheng
    Hong, Xia
    Harris, Chris J.
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2011, 74 (10) : 1564 - 1571
  • [5] Subject-Independent Slow Fall Detection with Wearable Sensors via Deep Learning
    Chen, Xiaoshuai
    Jiang, Shuo
    Lo, Benny
    [J]. 2020 IEEE SENSORS, 2020,
  • [6] Deep Principal Component Analysis Based on Layerwise Feature Extraction and Its Application to Nonlinear Process Monitoring
    Deng, Xiaogang
    Tian, Xuemin
    Chen, Sheng
    Harris, Chris J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 27 (06) : 2526 - 2540
  • [7] Fortuna L, 2007, ADV IND CONTROL, P1
  • [8] Process Data Analytics via Probabilistic Latent Variable Models: A Tutorial Review
    Ge, Zhiqiang
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2018, 57 (38) : 12646 - 12661
  • [9] Review of Recent Research on Data-Based Process Monitoring
    Ge, Zhiqiang
    Song, Zhihuan
    Gao, Furong
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2013, 52 (10) : 3543 - 3562
  • [10] Gurden SP, 2001, J CHEMOMETR, V15, P101, DOI 10.1002/1099-128X(200102)15:2<101::AID-CEM602>3.0.CO