Hegu Acupuncture for Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:29
作者
Yun, Mingdong [2 ]
Shao, Yongcong [1 ]
Zhang, Yan [2 ]
He, Sheng [2 ]
Xiong, Na [3 ]
Zhang, Jun [2 ]
Guo, Mingyang [2 ]
Liu, Defang [2 ]
Luo, Yong [2 ]
Guo, Lingling [2 ]
Yan, Jiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Acad Mil Med Sci, Beijing Inst Basic Med Sci, Beijing 100850, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Mil Gen Hosp, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Hosp Chengdu Mil Joint Logist Dept, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE; RATS; ELECTROACUPUNCTURE; RELIABILITY; EXPRESSION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; EFFICACY; PROTOCOL; ANALOG;
D O I
10.1089/acm.2010.0779
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background: Acupuncture has long been employed for the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, very few studies have characterized the effectiveness of the different acupuncture modes for CLBP. Methods: In total, 187 patients with CLBP participated in this study. Eligible patients were randomized to Hegu acupuncture, Standard acupuncture, or Usual Care groups. Eighteen (18) treatments were provided over 7 weeks. Back-related dysfunction and symptom severity were assessed by the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which were collected at baseline and at 8 and 48 weeks after beginning the treatment. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed for factorial analyses. Results: Significant differences were found between follow-up and the baseline scores (p < 0.05). The Hegu acupuncture group had higher RMDQ scores (8 weeks, 5.3 versus 2.1; 48 weeks, 5.7 versus 3.3; p < 0.001 for both) and VAS scores (8 weeks, 1.5 versus 0.5; 48 weeks, 2.6 versus 1.6; p < 0.001 for both) compared with the usual care group. The standardized acupuncture group also had higher RMDQ scores (8 weeks, 4.2 versus 2.1; 48 weeks, 4.6 versus 3.3, p < 0.001 for both) and VAS scores (8 weeks, 1.3 versus 0.5; 48 weeks, 2.4 versus 1.6, p < 0.001 for both) compared with the Usual Care group. The Hegu group had higher RMDQ scores (8 weeks, p < 0.05; 48 weeks, p < 0.001) and VAS scores (48 weeks, p < 0.05) compared with the standardized group. There was a significant difference between the Hegu and standardized acupuncture groups in repeated-measures ANOVA (p < 0.05). Across the three testing points, significant differences were found in the RMDQ and VAS scores between the usual care group and both treatment groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both acupuncture modes have beneficial and persistent effectiveness against CLBP compared with the usual care group; Hegu acupuncture is significantly more effective than standardized acupuncture, especially in the long term.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 136
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Primary care - Low back pain [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Weinstein, JN .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (05) :363-370
[12]   Acupuncture for back pain - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Ernst, E ;
White, AR .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (20) :2235-2241
[13]  
Fan Gang-Qi, 2010, Zhongguo Zhen Jiu, V30, P965
[14]  
GREENFIELD S, 1975, WESTERN J MED, V123, P350
[15]   Biomechanical response to acupuncture needling in humans [J].
Langevin, HM ;
Churchill, DL ;
Fox, JR ;
Badger, GJ ;
Garra, BS ;
Krag, MH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 91 (06) :2471-2478
[16]  
Li Yue-Mei, 2007, Zhen Ci Yan Jiu, V32, P136
[17]  
Moore JE, 1999, BACK PAIN HELPBOOK, P1
[18]   ASSESSING HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH SCIATICA [J].
PATRICK, DL ;
DEYO, RA ;
ATLAS, SJ ;
SINGER, DE ;
CHAPIN, A ;
KELLER, RB .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (17) :1899-1908
[19]   RELIABILITY OF A LINEAR ANALOG FOR EVALUATING PAIN [J].
REVILL, SI ;
ROBINSON, JO ;
ROSEN, M ;
HOGG, MIJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 1976, 31 (09) :1191-1198
[20]   GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF PAIN [J].
SCOTT, J ;
HUSKISSON, EC .
PAIN, 1976, 2 (02) :175-184