Dealing with Institutional Distances in International Marketing Channels: Governance Strategies That Engender Legitimacy and Efficiency

被引:245
作者
Yang, Zhilin [1 ]
Su, Chenting [1 ]
Fam, Kim-Shyan [2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Business, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Mkt & Int Business, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
institutional distance; legitimacy pressure; market ambiguity; contract customization; relational governance; firm performance; RELATIONAL GOVERNANCE; TRANSACTION COST; PERFORMANCE; CONTRACTS; BUSINESS; FIRM; OPPORTUNISM; UNCERTAINTY; ENVIRONMENT; LIABILITY;
D O I
10.1509/jm.10.0033
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Firms doing business in foreign institutional environments face pressures to gain social acceptance (commonly referred to as legitimacy) and difficulty in evaluating market information, both of which undercut firm performance. In this article, the authors argue that firms can design governance strategies to deal with foreign institutions to secure both social acceptance and firm performance. Using a Chinese sample of manufacturers that export products to various foreign markets through local distributors, the authors develop and test a model that bridges the effects of institutional environments and governance strategy on channel performance. Specifically, they find that firms can use two governance strategies, contract customization and relational governance, to deal with both legitimacy and efficiency issues and to safeguard channel performance. Thus, international channel managers are advised to maintain an integrated management of legitimacy and efficiency in foreign marketing channels.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 55
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Anderson E., 1985, MARKET SCI, V4, P234, DOI [DOI 10.1287/MKSC.4.3.234, 10.1287/mksc.4.3.234]
[2]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, SSRN Scholarly Paper 1496720
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Techniques and Applications, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315650982
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ACAD MANAGEMENT P
[7]  
Argyres N, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P1060, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.26585739
[8]  
Bagozzi R. P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/bf02723327]
[9]   Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection [J].
Beckman, CM ;
Haunschild, PR ;
Phillips, DJ .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (03) :259-275
[10]   The effect of output controls, process controls, and flexibility on export channel performance [J].
Bello, DC ;
Gilliland, DI .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1997, 61 (01) :22-38