Strategic Deployment of Orthographic Knowledge in Phoneme Detection

被引:21
作者
Cutler, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Treiman, Rebecca [3 ]
van Ooijen, Brit [4 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, NL-6500 AH Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Western Sydney, MARCS Auditory Labs, Penrith, NSW 1797, Australia
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[4] Maersk Oil, Dept Human Resources, Doha, Qatar
关键词
orthography; phonemes; spelling consistency; spoken-word recognition; SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0023830910371445
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The phoneme detection task is widely used in spoken-word recognition research. Alphabetically literate participants, however, are more used to explicit representations of letters than of phonemes. The present study explored whether phoneme detection is sensitive to how target phonemes are, or may be, orthographically realized. Listeners detected the target sounds [b, m, t, f, s, k] in word-initial position in sequences of isolated English words. Response times were faster to the targets [b, m, t], which have consistent word-initial spelling, than to the targets [f, s, k], which are inconsistently spelled, but only when spelling was rendered salient by the presence in the experiment of many irregularly spelled filler words. Within the inconsistent targets [f, s, k], there was no significant difference between responses to targets in words with more usual (foam, seed, cattle) versus less usual (phone, cede, kettle) spellings. Phoneme detection is thus not necessarily sensitive to orthographic effects; knowledge of spelling stored in the lexical representations of words does not automatically become available as word candidates are activated. However, salient orthographic manipulations in experimental input can induce such sensitivity. We attribute this to listeners' experience of the value of spelling in everyday situations that encourage phonemic decisions (such as learning new names).
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 320
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 1) CD-ROM
[2]   Reading spoken words:: Orthographic effects in auditory priming [J].
Chereau, Celine ;
Gaskell, M. Gareth ;
Dumay, Nicolas .
COGNITION, 2007, 102 (03) :341-360
[3]  
Connine CM, 1996, LANG COGNITIVE PROC, V11, P635
[4]   Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition [J].
Connine, CM ;
Titone, D ;
Deelman, T ;
Blasko, D .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 37 (04) :463-480
[5]   PHONEME IDENTIFICATION AND THE LEXICON [J].
CUTLER, A ;
MEHLER, J ;
NORRIS, D ;
SEGUI, J .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 19 (02) :141-177
[6]  
Cutler A, 2009, INTERSPEECH 2009: 10TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2009, VOLS 1-5, P388
[7]   ORTHOGRAPHIC EFFECTS ON PHONEME MONITORING [J].
DIJKSTRA, T ;
ROELOFS, A ;
FIEUWS, S .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1995, 49 (02) :264-271
[8]   LEXICAL EFFECTS IN PHONEMIC PROCESSING - FACILITATORY OR INHIBITORY [J].
FRAUENFELDER, UH ;
SEGUI, J ;
DIJKSTRA, T .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (01) :77-91
[9]   Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception [J].
Gaskell, MG ;
Marslen-Wilson, WD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (02) :380-396
[10]   Grapheme-phoneme probabilities in British English [J].
Gontijo, PFD ;
Gontijo, I ;
Shillcock, R .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2003, 35 (01) :136-157