Evaluation of factors associated with en bloc colonic underwater endoscopic mucosal resection

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Chien-An [1 ,2 ]
Ho, Chung-Han [3 ,4 ]
Hsieh, Ping-Hsin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Hepatogastroenterol, 901 Zhonghua Rd, Tainan 71004, Taiwan
[2] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Holist Care, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Med Res, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Hosp & Hlth Care Adm, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR); endoscopic therapy; new endoscopic technique; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; COLORECTAL LESIONS; LARGE SESSILE; RISK-FACTORS; EMR; CANCER; POLYPECTOMY; RECURRENCES; NEOPLASIA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/aid2.13207
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a relatively simple and safe method for resecting sessile colorectal polyps without a submucosal injection. Only around 1000 UEMRs have been reported in a few studies, and none of the previous studies directly evaluated the factors associated with a successful en bloc resection. We retrospectively evaluated the factors associated with a successful en bloc resection using UEMR from 160 patients between August 2015 and November 2017. Of 173 polyps removed with UEMR, 141 polyps (81.5%) were removed en bloc. Univariable analysis showed that polyp size >= 20 mm (OR: 0.047, 95% CI: 0.014-0.162, P < .001), prior treatment (OR: 0.297, 95% CI: 0.135-0.655, P = .003), and polyp morphology (flat vs sessile) (OR: 0.111, 95% CI: 0.025-0.482, P = .003) were the significant factors for en bloc resection. Multivariate analysis showed that polyp size >= 20 mm (OR: 0.053, 95% CI: 0.015-0.194, P < .001), prior treatment (OR: 0.313, 95% CI: 0.118-0.832, P = .020), and polyp morphology (flat vs sessile) (OR: 0.095, 95% CI: 0.019-0.469, P = .004) were still significant. The rate of adverse events was 3.5% (n = 6) and included delayed hemorrhages (n = 2, 1.2%), muscle defects requiring endoscopic clipping (n = 3, 1.7%), and delayed perforations (n = 1, 0.6%). Polyp size < 20 mm, without prior treatment, and sessile polyp morphology were significantly associated with en bloc UEMR.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of serrated adenomas
    Chaves, Dalton Marques
    Brito, Flelcio Pedrosa
    Chaves, Lumi Tomishige
    Rodrigues, Rodrigo Azevedo
    Sugai, Beatriz Monica
    CLINICS, 2018, 73
  • [42] Factors that predict bleeding following endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions
    Metz, A. J.
    Bourke, M. J.
    Moss, A.
    Williams, S. J.
    Swan, M. P.
    Byth, K.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 43 (06) : 506 - 511
  • [43] Endoscopic resection outcomes and predictors of failed en bloc endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps ≤ 20 mm among advanced endoscopy trainees
    King, William W.
    Draganov, Peter V.
    Wang, Andrew Y.
    Uppal, Dushant
    Rumman, Amir
    Kumta, Nikhil A.
    DiMaio, Christopher J.
    Trindade, Arvind J.
    Sejpal, Divyesh V.
    D'Souza, Lionel S.
    Bucobo, Juan C.
    Gomez, Victoria
    Wallace, Michael B.
    Pohl, Heiko
    Yang, Dennis
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (11) : E1820 - E1826
  • [44] Longly-attached cap can contribute to en bloc underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of 20-30 mm colorectal intramucosal lesions
    Iwagami, Hiroyoshi
    Akamatsu, Takuji
    Ogino, Shinya
    Morimura, Hiroki
    Shimoyama, Masayuki
    Terashita, Tomoko
    Nakano, Shogo
    Wakita, Midori
    Edagawa, Takeya
    Konishi, Takafumi
    Nakatani, Yasuki
    Yamashita, Yukitaka
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (12) : E1562 - E1569
  • [45] Clinicopathological evaluation of the efficacy of endoscopic treatment for sessile serrated lesions comparing endoscopic mucosal resection, cold snare polypectomy, and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection
    Kagemoto, Kaizo
    Okamoto, Koichi
    Okada, Yasuyuki
    Sei, Motoko
    Fujimoto, Shota
    Yagi, Mai
    Mitsuhashi, Takeshi
    Ueda, Hiroyuki
    Yoshimoto, Takanori
    Kashihara, Takanori
    Kawaguchi, Tomoyuki
    Kida, Yoshifumi
    Mitsui, Yasuhiro
    Kawano, Yutaka
    Sogabe, Masahiro
    Miyamoto, Hiroshi
    Sato, Yasushi
    Muguruma, Naoki
    Takayama, Tetsuji
    DEN OPEN, 2025, 5 (01):
  • [46] Novel technique for endoscopic en bloc resection (EMR plus )-Evaluation in a porcine model
    Meier, Benjamin
    Wannhoff, Andreas
    Klinger, Christoph
    Caca, Karel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 25 (28) : 3764 - 3774
  • [47] Novel technique for endoscopic en bloc resection(EMR+)-Evaluation in a porcine model
    Benjamin Meier
    Andreas Wannhoff
    Christoph Klinger
    Karel Caca
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2019, (28) : 3764 - 3774
  • [48] FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH POST-ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION RECURRENCE
    Deepali, Fnu
    Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
    Chesta, Fnu
    Singh, Prabh G.
    Singh, Anmol
    Song, Louis M. Wong Kee
    Buttar, Navtej S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB185 - AB186
  • [49] Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps
    Robert J. Schenck
    Darius A. Jahann
    James T. Patrie
    Edward B. Stelow
    Dawn G. Cox
    Dushant S. Uppal
    Bryan G. Sauer
    Vanessa M. Shami
    Daniel S. Strand
    Andrew Y. Wang
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 4174 - 4183
  • [50] Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Is Associated With Fewer Recurrences and Earlier Curative Resections Compared to Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Large Colorectal Polyps
    Schenck, Robert J.
    Jahann, Darius A.
    Patrie, James T.
    Sauer, Bryan G.
    Shami, Vanessa M.
    Strand, Daniel S.
    Wang, Andrew Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S569 - S570