Risk Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and PRAT for Sustainable Engineering Projects

被引:33
作者
Koulinas, G. K. [1 ]
Demesouka, O. E. [1 ]
Marhavilas, P. K. [1 ]
Vavatsikos, A. P. [1 ]
Koulouriotis, D. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Democritus Univ Thrace, Dept Prod & Management Engn, 12 Vas Sofias st, GR-67100 Xanthi, Greece
关键词
risk assessment; Fuzzy TOPSIS; construction safety; PRAT method; sustainability; CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY; OCCUPATIONAL-SAFETY; HIERARCHY PROCESS; MODIFIED ANP; HEALTH; MANAGEMENT; PART; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/su11030615
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, we propose a safety risk assessment process using the fuzzy extension of the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for assigning priorities to risks in worksites, in order to promote the health, safety and well-being of workers, issues that are embedded within the concept of sustainability, specifically belonging to the social sphere of sustainability. The multicriteria method works in cooperation with a simple quantitative risk analysis and assessment process, the proportional risk assessment technique (PRAT), the functionality of which is based on real data. The efficiency of this approach is validated through treating a construction project example in Greece, and the results are compared with real fatal and non-fatal accidents data for the years 2014-2016. This integrated multicriteria approach can be used by risk managers as a tool for assessing safety risks and making informed decisions about the manner that a constraint budget would be spent in order to maximize health and safety in workplace.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects [J].
Aminbakhsh, Saman ;
Gunduz, Murat ;
Sonmez, Rifat .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2013, 46 :99-105
[2]   Occupational risk of building construction [J].
Aneziris, O. N. ;
Topali, E. ;
Papazoglou, I. A. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 105 :36-46
[3]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[4]  
Cococcioni M, 2016, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P3695, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2016.7744257
[5]   DEMATEL-ANP Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects [J].
Dehdasht, Gholamreza ;
Zin, Rosli Mohamad ;
Ferwati, M. Salim ;
Abdullahi, Mu'azu Mohammed ;
Keyvanfar, Ali ;
McCaffer, Ronald .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08)
[6]   A new approach to predict safety outcomes in the construction industry [J].
Ghodrati, Nariman ;
Yiu, Tak Wing ;
Wilkinson, Suzanne ;
Shahbazpour, Mehdi .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 109 :86-94
[7]   Validity and validation of safety-related quantitative risk analysis: A review [J].
Goerlandt, Floris ;
Khakzad, Nima ;
Reniers, Genserik .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 99 :127-139
[8]   Risk Assessment of Infrastructure System of Systems with Precursor Analysis [J].
Guo, Zhenyu ;
Haimes, Yacov Y. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2016, 36 (08) :1630-1643
[9]  
Hwang C.-L., 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, P58, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93]
[10]   A NEW APPROACH FOR MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING [J].
HWANG, CL ;
LAI, YJ ;
LIU, TY .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1993, 20 (08) :889-899