Exploring Farmers' Perceptions of Agricultural Technologies: A Case Study from Tanzania

被引:31
作者
Jha, Srijna [1 ,2 ]
Kaechele, Harald [1 ,3 ]
Lana, Marcos [1 ,4 ]
Amjath-Babu, T. S. [1 ,5 ]
Sieber, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Sustainable Land Use Developing Countries SusLAND, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Fac Life Sci Thaer Inst, Dept Agr Econ, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[3] Eberswalde Univ Sustainable Dev HNEE, Dept Environm Econ, Schickler Str 5, D-16225 Eberswalde, Germany
[4] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Crop Prod Ecol, Box 7044, S-76007 Uppsala, Sweden
[5] CIMMYT, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
sustainability; adoption; scaling-up; agricultural technologies; farmer perceptions; agricultural productivity; food security; Tanzania; SMALL-SCALE IRRIGATION; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; GREEN-REVOLUTION; ADOPTION; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSTRAINTS; INDICATOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/su12030998
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The low agricultural productivity of key crops and food insecurity continue to be key issues in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Tanzania. The growing population, depleting resources, and changing climate further amplify these issues. Globally, many agricultural technologies (AgTs) are available as pathways for improved agricultural productivity and food security, however, they have had relatively little success in SSA and Tanzania. This is because the uptake of AgTs is a complex process, which is highly localized, involving multiple actors, stages, and spatial and time dimensions. Smallholder farmers often experience issues of sustainability, constraints for adoption, and scaling-up throughout the uptake process of AgTs, all of which vary by region. This indicates a need for a systematic and simultaneous understanding of sustainability, constraints for adoption, and scaling-up of AgTs to better guide agricultural strategy and policy interventions in SSA and Tanzania. Moreover, in order to understand the local settings better, a consideration of the perceptions of the farmers themselves, who are the primary actors in the uptake process of AgTs, is key. Acknowledging this, the study takes on a case study approach, using the scaling-up assessment (ScalA) method and three focus group discussions with a total of 44 smallholder farmers to systematically and simultaneously assess the sustainability, constraints for adoption, and scaling-up of three AgTs (use of fertilizers, improved seeds, and small-scale irrigation) in Tanzania. The study finds that the farmers perceive all three AgTs to be sustainable for the study region. Adoption rates are perceived to be medium for use of fertilizers, high for improved seeds, and low for small-scale irrigation. The most significant constraints for adoption experienced by the farmers are lack of technical physical inputs, marketing facilities, and know-how. Scaling-up is perceived to be well fulfilled for use of fertilizers and improved seeds, but only partially fulfilled for small-scale irrigation, which is the most limited of the three AgTs. The most significant constraints for scaling-up experienced by farmers are a lack of confidence in the added value of the AgTs beyond project activities, marketing facilities, and technical physical inputs. The overall success potential is high for the use of fertilizers and improved seeds, and the average for small-scale irrigation. The farmers' perceptions partially indicate why the bundle of AgTs is lacking in the study region and provide a basis for discussing targeted agricultural and policy interventions in Tanzania.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   FARMERS PERCEPTIONS AND ADOPTION OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY - EVIDENCE FROM ANALYSIS IN BURKINA-FASO AND GUINEA, WEST-AFRICA [J].
ADESINA, AA ;
BAIDUFORSON, J .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 13 (01) :1-9
[2]   Transitioning to groundwater irrigated intensified agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa: An indicator based assessment [J].
Amjath-Babu, T. S. ;
Krupnik, Timothy J. ;
Kaechele, Harald ;
Aravindakshan, Sreejith ;
Sietz, Diana .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2016, 168 :125-135
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN REPORT
[4]  
[Anonymous], P AFR ASS AGR EC SHA
[5]  
[Anonymous], INCREASING INVESTMEN
[6]  
[Anonymous], INTEGR ASSESS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ACCESS ADOPTION IMPR
[8]  
[Anonymous], SCALING PROGRAMS RUR
[9]  
[Anonymous], SSRN ELECT J
[10]  
[Anonymous], AGROECOLOGY SCALING