Sensitivity and uncertainty quantification for the ECOSTRESS evapotranspiration algorithm - DisALEXI

被引:21
作者
Cawse-Nicholson, Kerry [1 ]
Braverman, Amy [1 ]
Kang, Emily L. [2 ]
Li, Miaoqi [2 ]
Johnson, Margaret [1 ]
Halverson, Gregory [1 ]
Anderson, Martha [3 ]
Hain, Christopher [4 ]
Gunson, Michael [1 ]
Hook, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[3] USDA, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[4] NASA, Marshall Space Flight Ctr, Huntsville, AL USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Uncertainty; Spatial statistics; disALEXI; Evapotranspiration; ENERGY-BALANCE; MAPPING EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; MODEL; FLUXES; MODIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jag.2020.102088
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Evapotranspiration (ET) is a measure of plant water use that is utilized regionally for drought detection and monitoring, and locally for agricultural water resource management. Understanding the uncertainty associated with this measurement is vital for science predictions and analysis and for water resource management decision making. In this manuscript, the uncertainty in disaggregated Atmosphere-Land Exchange (disALEXI) is quantified; disALEXI is an ET algorithm that utilizes land surface temperature (LST) derived from the ECOsystem Spaceborne Thermal Radiometer Experiment on Space Station (ECOSTRESS), as well ancillary inputs for landcover, elevation, vegetation parameters, and meteorological inputs. Since each of these inputs has an associated, and potentially unknown, uncertainty, in this study a Monte Carlo simulation based on a spatial statistical model is used to determine the algorithm's sensitivity to each of its inputs, and to quantify the probability distribution of algorithm outputs. Analysis shows that algorithm is most sensitive to LST (the input derived from ECOSTRESS). Significantly, the output uncertainty distribution is non-Gaussian, due to the non-linear nature of the algorithm. This means that ET uncertainty cannot be prescribed by accuracy and precision alone. Here, uncertainty was represented using five quantiles of the output distribution. The distribution was consistent across five different datasets (mean offset is 0.01 mm/day, and 95% of the data is contained within 0.3 mm/day). An additional two datasets with low ET, showed higher uncertainty (95% of the data is within 1 mm/day), and a positive bias (i.e., ET was overestimated by an average of 0.12 mm/day when ET was low).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC) - Applications
    Allen, Richard G.
    Tasumi, Masahiro
    Morse, Anthon
    Trezza, Ricardo
    Wright, James L.
    Bastiaanssen, Wim
    Kramber, William
    Lorite, Ignacio
    Robison, Clarence W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2007, 133 (04) : 395 - 406
  • [2] The Evaporative Stress Index as an indicator of agricultural drought in Brazil: An assessment based on crop yield impacts
    Anderson, Martha C.
    Zolin, Cornelio A.
    Sentelhas, Paulo C.
    Hain, Christopher R.
    Semmens, Kathryn
    Yilmaz, M. Tugrul
    Gao, Feng
    Otkin, Jason A.
    Tetrault, Robert
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 174 : 82 - 99
  • [3] Mapping daily evapotranspiration at Landsat spatial scales during the BEAREX'08 field campaign
    Anderson, Martha C.
    Kustas, William P.
    Alfieri, Joseph G.
    Gao, Feng
    Hain, Christopher
    Prueger, John H.
    Evett, Steven
    Colaizzi, Paul
    Howell, Terry
    Chavez, Jose L.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2012, 50 : 162 - 177
  • [4] A two-source time-integrated model for estimating surface fluxes using thermal infrared remote sensing
    Anderson, MC
    Norman, JM
    Diak, GR
    Kustas, WP
    Mecikalski, JR
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 60 (02) : 195 - 216
  • [5] Anderson MC, 2004, J HYDROMETEOROL, V5, P343, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0343:AMRSMF>2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2019, TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [8] [Anonymous], TECHNICAL REPORT
  • [9] [Anonymous], ECOSTRESS LEVEL 2 LA
  • [10] [Anonymous], ECOSTRESS GEOLOCATIO