Maturity Levels in Knowledge Management - a Case Study Approach

被引:0
作者
Vanini, Ute [1 ]
Bochert, Saskia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Kiel, Kiel, Germany
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL (ECIC 2014) | 2014年
关键词
knowledge management; maturity levels; influence factors; case study research; FIRM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to analyse if knowledge management maturity models can be applied in corporate practice. So far, empirical studies have mainly examined the influence of knowledge management ( KM) on innovation and have identified KM success factors. The underlying assumption is that more KM leads to more innovation and an improved corporate success. Therefore, a thorough KM application is recommended. Little attention has been paid to the question which level of KM application is effective and efficient for a company. This paper tries to close this gap using the concept of KM maturity. It investigates if different KM maturity levels can be identified in corporate practice and in how far they are influenced by specific factors, e.g. company size. To answer the research questions, exploratory case studies were conducted through semi-structured qualitative interviews with representatives from ten northern German companies. The results show that the practical applicability of KM maturity models is still limited. None of the companies can be categorized to have a high KM maturity level despite their multiple use of KM tools. As influence factors the size of a company and an externally certified quality management were identified. Other factors like the industry, R&D spending, and the kind of products or services offered do not reveal a clear impact. The paper contributes to the understanding of KM maturity and its influence factors and thus provides the foundation for further empirical research. Moreover, the findings help organisations to position their KM efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 301
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues [J].
Alavi, M ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :107-136
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation
[3]  
[Anonymous], J INFORM KNOWLEDGE M
[4]  
Carnegie Mellon University, 1994, CAPABILITY MATURITY
[5]   An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance [J].
Choi, B ;
Lee, H .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2003, 40 (05) :403-417
[6]  
Darroch J., 2005, Journal of Knowledge Management, V9, P101, DOI 10.1108/13673270510602809
[7]  
Dayan R., 2006, Journal of Knowledge Management, V10, P69, DOI 10.1108/13673270610650111
[8]  
Devenport TH, 2000, WORKING KNOWLEDGE OR
[9]   Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges [J].
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. ;
Graebner, Melissa E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (01) :25-32
[10]  
Grant R.M., 2002, STRATEG MANAG, P133, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199275212.003.0008