ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD: A REVIEW, CRITIQUE, AND PATH FORWARD FOR SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH

被引:101
作者
Vedula, Siddharth [1 ]
Doblinger, Claudia [2 ]
Pacheco, Desiree [3 ]
York, Jeffrey G. [4 ]
Bacq, Sophie [5 ]
Russo, Michael, V [6 ]
Dean, Thomas J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Management, Entrepreneurship, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Innovat & Technol Management, Campus Straubing Biotechnol & Sustainabil, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Univ Colorado, Strategy & Entrepreneurship, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Entrepreneurship, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[6] Univ Oregon, Sustainable Management, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[7] Colorado State Univ, Entrepreneurship & Sustainable Enterprise, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
MARKET-BASED APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP; GRAND CHALLENGES; BUSINESS MODELS; INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; WIND ENERGY; COMMERCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS; TEAM FORMATION;
D O I
10.5465/annals.2019.0143
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Entrepreneurship is routinely promoted as a solution to our most pressing societal and environmental challenges. Two emerging literature streams have sought to examine how and when such solutions may emerge. In this review, we examine the literature on social entrepreneurship (SE) and environmental entrepreneurship (EE) to expose potential linkages, disconnects, and a path forward. We do so by combining bibliometric network analyses with a detailed qualitative review of the literature from 1994 to 2019. Through this process we: (a) identify a pattern of convergent evolution, whereby SE and EE share some common elements today, while originating in distinct scholarly communities with different epistemological roots; (b) offer a conceptual framework that identifies specific areas for collaboration and learning between SE and EE; and (c) propose how these streams can be integrated in order to elevate the impact of the field of entrepreneurship. We argue that such integration can enable entrepreneurship research to fulfill its promise of understanding how and when entrepreneurial action contributes to the public good.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 425
页数:35
相关论文
共 280 条
  • [81] Eom S., 2009, Author cocitation analysis: quantitative methods for mapping the intellectual structure of an academic discipline
  • [82] Entrepreneurship, Social Capital, and Institutions: Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship Across Nations
    Estrin, Saul
    Mickiewicz, Tomasz
    Stephan, Ute
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2013, 37 (03) : 479 - 504
  • [83] Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations?
    Estrin, Saul
    Korosteleva, Julia
    Mickiewicz, Tomasz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2013, 28 (04) : 564 - 580
  • [84] The future of research on entrepreneurial intentions
    Fayolle, Alain
    Linan, Francisco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2014, 67 (05) : 663 - 666
  • [85] Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited
    Ferraro, Fabrizio
    Etzion, Dror
    Gehman, Joel
    [J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2015, 36 (03) : 363 - 390
  • [86] Entrepreneurship research: mapping intellectual structures and research trends
    Ferreira, Joao J. M.
    Fernandes, Cristina I.
    Kraus, Sascha
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 13 (01) : 181 - 205
  • [87] Entrepreneurial team formation: An exploration of new member addition
    Forbes, DP
    Borchert, PS
    Zellmer-Bruhn, ME
    Sapienza, HJ
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2006, 30 (02) : 225 - 248
  • [88] Friedland R., 1991, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, P232
  • [89] Measuring the Integration of Social and Environmental Missions in Hybrid Organizations
    Gamble, Edward N.
    Parker, Simon C.
    Moroz, Peter W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 167 (02) : 271 - 284
  • [90] Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship
    Garud, R
    Karnoe, P
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (02) : 277 - 300