ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD: A REVIEW, CRITIQUE, AND PATH FORWARD FOR SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP RESEARCH

被引:101
作者
Vedula, Siddharth [1 ]
Doblinger, Claudia [2 ]
Pacheco, Desiree [3 ]
York, Jeffrey G. [4 ]
Bacq, Sophie [5 ]
Russo, Michael, V [6 ]
Dean, Thomas J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Management, Entrepreneurship, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Innovat & Technol Management, Campus Straubing Biotechnol & Sustainabil, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
[4] Univ Colorado, Strategy & Entrepreneurship, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Entrepreneurship, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[6] Univ Oregon, Sustainable Management, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[7] Colorado State Univ, Entrepreneurship & Sustainable Enterprise, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
MARKET-BASED APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP; GRAND CHALLENGES; BUSINESS MODELS; INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; WIND ENERGY; COMMERCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS; TEAM FORMATION;
D O I
10.5465/annals.2019.0143
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Entrepreneurship is routinely promoted as a solution to our most pressing societal and environmental challenges. Two emerging literature streams have sought to examine how and when such solutions may emerge. In this review, we examine the literature on social entrepreneurship (SE) and environmental entrepreneurship (EE) to expose potential linkages, disconnects, and a path forward. We do so by combining bibliometric network analyses with a detailed qualitative review of the literature from 1994 to 2019. Through this process we: (a) identify a pattern of convergent evolution, whereby SE and EE share some common elements today, while originating in distinct scholarly communities with different epistemological roots; (b) offer a conceptual framework that identifies specific areas for collaboration and learning between SE and EE; and (c) propose how these streams can be integrated in order to elevate the impact of the field of entrepreneurship. We argue that such integration can enable entrepreneurship research to fulfill its promise of understanding how and when entrepreneurial action contributes to the public good.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 425
页数:35
相关论文
共 280 条
  • [141] Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite™-based historiograms
    Lucio-Arias, Diana
    Leydesdorff, Loet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (12): : 1948 - 1962
  • [142] CIVIC WEALTH CREATION: A NEW VIEW OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND SOCIETAL IMPACT
    Lumpkin, G. T.
    Bacq, Sophie
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2019, 33 (04) : 383 - 404
  • [143] Where Change Happens: Community-Level Phenomena in Social Entrepreneurship Research
    Lumpkin, G. T.
    Bacq, Sophie
    Pidduck, Robert J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 56 (01) : 24 - 50
  • [144] Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: how are they different, if at all?
    Lumpkin, G. T.
    Moss, Todd W.
    Gras, David M.
    Kato, Shoko
    Amezcua, Alejandro S.
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 (03) : 761 - 783
  • [145] Social entrepreneurship research:: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight
    Mair, J
    Martí, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2006, 41 (01) : 36 - 44
  • [146] Mair J., 2020, The nonprofit sector: A research handbook, P333
  • [147] Mair J, 2006, SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP-BOOK, P121
  • [148] SCAFFOLDING: A PROCESS OF TRANSFORMING PATTERNS OF INEQUALITY IN SMALL-SCALE SOCIETIES
    Mair, Johanna
    Wolf, Miriam
    Seelos, Christian
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 59 (06) : 2021 - 2044
  • [149] Navigating Institutional Plurality: Organizational Governance in Hybrid Organizations
    Mair, Johanna
    Mayer, Judith
    Lutz, Eva
    [J]. ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2015, 36 (06) : 713 - 739
  • [150] BUILDING INCLUSIVE MARKETS IN RURAL BANGLADESH: HOW INTERMEDIARIES WORK INSTITUTIONAL VOIDS
    Mair, Johanna
    Marti, Ignasi
    Ventresca, Marc J.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (04) : 819 - 850