A novel probabilistic hesitant fuzzy rough set based multi-criteria decision-making method

被引:30
作者
Jin, Chenxia [1 ,2 ]
Mi, Jusheng [1 ]
Li, Fachao [2 ]
Liang, Meishe [3 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Normal Univ, Sch Math Sci, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] Shijiazhuang Tiedao Univ, Dept Math & Phys, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
MCDM; Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set; Rough set; Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy rough set; PROMETHEE II method; 2; UNIVERSES; EXTENSION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2022.06.085
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this study, the fusion of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets (PHFSs) and rough sets is explored and applied to uncertain multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). First, to reduce the huge amount of computation of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy operations in the MCDM process, we introduce an advanced method to obtain normalized PHFSs (NPHFSs), in which each probabilistic hesitant fuzzy element (PHFE) has the same length and probability distribution. Second, based on NPHFSs, a novel probabilistic hesitant fuzzy rough set (PHFRS) model is established to solve the information aggregation problem in MCDM. Subsequently, we propose the concept of fuzziness of a PHFRS and develop a fuzzinessbased objective weight determination method. Further, we construct an extended PROMETHEE II method based on a PHFRS for MCDM problems. Finally, we analyze the effectiveness of our proposed method through two MCDM problems along with experimental comparisons. The results illustrate that the proposed method is useful in numerous uncertain application fields. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 516
页数:28
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Decomposition theorems and extension principles for hesitant fuzzy sets [J].
Alcantud, Jose Carlos R. ;
Torra, Vicenc .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2018, 41 :48-56
[2]   EDAS method for decision support modeling under the Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation information [J].
Batool, Bushra ;
Abosuliman, Shougi Suliman ;
Abdullah, Saleem ;
Ashraf, Shahzaib .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 13 (12) :5491-5504
[3]   Entropy Based Pythagorean Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Decision Making Technique and Its Application for Fog-Haze Factor Assessment Problem [J].
Batool, Bushra ;
Ahmad, Mumtaz ;
Abdullah, Saleem ;
Ashraf, Shahzaib ;
Chinram, Ronnason .
ENTROPY, 2020, 22 (03)
[4]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[5]   Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making [J].
Chen, Na ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Xia, Meimei .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2013, 37 :528-540
[6]   Uncertainty measures for probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets in multiple criteria decision making [J].
Farhadinia, Bahram ;
Aickelin, Uwe ;
Khorshidi, Hadi Akbarzadeh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2020, 35 (11) :1646-1679
[7]   A Dynamic Reference Point Method for Emergency Response Under Hesitant Probabilistic Fuzzy Environment [J].
Gao, Jie ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Liao, Huchang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 19 (05) :1261-1278
[8]   Attitude quantifier based possibility distribution generation method for hesitant fuzzy linguistic group decision making [J].
Hao, Jingjing ;
Chiclana, Francisco .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 518 :341-360
[9]   CARDINAL WELFARE, INDIVIDUALISTIC ETHICS, AND INTERPERSONAL COMPARISONS OF UTILITY [J].
Harsanyi, John C. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1955, 63 (04) :309-321
[10]   Multi-attribute group decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment with application to evaluate the transformation efficiency [J].
Jiang, Fangju ;
Ma, Qinggong .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 48 (04) :953-965