Changes and Consistencies in Diabetes Education Over 5 Years Results of the 2010 National Diabetes Education Practice Survey

被引:17
作者
Martin, Annette Lenzi [1 ]
机构
[1] Lenzi Martin Commun Inc, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
CARE; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0145721711427611
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of the National Diabetes Education Practice Survey (NPS) of the American Association of Diabetes Educators (AADE) is to describe the current diabetes education practice and specific interventions and responsibilities of diabetes educators in the United States. Method The 2010 NPS contained 52 items addressing diabetes education program structure, processes, interventions, outcomes, quality improvement, and adoption of health care reform models and AADE guidelines. The survey was hosted online, with 2513 AADE members participating. The 2010 results were compared with those from previous surveys. Results The majority of 2010 respondents provided diabetes education at one site, most commonly in a clinical outpatient/managed care setting. A wide range of services, including patient support, were provided. Team member functions, hours spent, and instructional methods also varied widely. More than half of programs measured at least one behavioral and clinical outcome in 2010. Most programs engaged in quality improvement. Many respondents were unfamiliar with the patient-centered medical home and accountable care organization models. Conclusions The results highlight the need for educators to increase their reporting of outcomes. Educators are also urged to raise their knowledge of health care delivery reform models. Wider adoption of AADE diabetes education practice guidelines will help ensure effective team involvement and optimal patient-centered education. Despite an increase in hours spent on diabetes self-management education and training (DSME/T) and clinical functions in diabetes education, many programs operated at a financial loss in 2010, underscoring the need for improved reimbursement of these services. Continuation of the NPS biannually is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 46
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] American Association of Diabetes Educators, 2009, GUID PRACT DIAB ED
  • [2] American Association of Diabetes Educators, 2009, COMP DIAB ED COMP DO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, Joint Principles of the Patient- Centered Medical Home
  • [4] [Anonymous], DIABETES ED
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, National Diabetes Fact Sheet
  • [6] Costs and Benefits Associated With Diabetes Education A Review of the Literature
    Boren, Suzanne A.
    Fitzner, Karen A.
    Panhalkar, Pallavi S.
    Specker, James E.
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2009, 35 (01) : 72 - 96
  • [7] Donebedian A., 1980, DEFINITION QUALITY A
  • [8] Draheim MD, DIABETES ED, V35, P181
  • [9] Assessing the Value of Diabetes Education
    Duncan, Ian
    Birkmeyer, Christian
    Coughlin, Sheryl
    Li, Qijuan
    Sherr, Dawn
    Boren, Sue
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2009, 35 (05) : 752 - 760
  • [10] Meta-analysis of randomized educational and behavioral interventions in type 2 diabetes
    Gary, TL
    Genkinger, JM
    Guallar, E
    Peyrot, M
    Brancati, FL
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2003, 29 (03) : 488 - 501