CONTINGENT LIABILITIES OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS (PPPS) IN RUSSIA AND BRICS COUNTRIES: ASSESSMENT AND RISK MITIGATION MECHANISMS

被引:0
作者
Krasnopeeva, N. [1 ]
Morozkina, A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Govt Russian Federat, Analyt Ctr, 12 Prospekt Akad Sakharova, Moscow 107078, Russia
[2] Minist Finance Russian Federat, Financial Res Inst, 3 B2 Nastasyinsky Lane, Moscow 127006, Russia
[3] Struct Reforms Direct Econ Expert Grp, Moscow, Russia
来源
VESTNIK MEZHDUNARODNYKH ORGANIZATSII-INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH JOURNAL | 2021年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
PPPs; fiscal risks; implicit and contingent liabilities; BRICS; monitoring of contingent liabilities;
D O I
10.17323/1996-7845-2021-04-07
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article is devoted to the assessment of the conditional liabilities of public-private partnerships (PPPs) and measures to reduce the risks associated with them. First, a quantitative assessment of the contingent liabilities of PPP projects at the federal level is carried out. Contingent liabilities for public-private partnership projects are estimated to amount to 2.3 trillion roubles for the period 2021-52. Second, the experience of creating a system for managing the contingent liabilities of PPPs in Russia and the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) is summarized. This analysis shows that each of the BRICS countries has a legislative and technical framework for managing fiscal liabilities, but does not use it to the fullest extent. Consequently, to improve functioning it is necessary to regularly update, fill in, and expand the number of available financial indicators for PPP projects. Of the BRICS countries, South Africa is characterized by the most complete and transparent system for managing PPP-related contingent liabilities, but Russia could use some of the measures implemented in other BRICS countries to improve its own system, including the creation of a guarantee fund (Brazil), a system for operational project evaluation (India) and the practice of project approval by the fiscal authority (China).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:38
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Andrjakov A.D., 2018, FINANSOVYJ ZH, P59, DOI [10.31107/2075-1990-2018-6-59-70, DOI 10.31107/2075-1990-2018-6-59-70]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, History RePPPeated: How Public Private Partnerships are Failing
[3]  
[Anonymous], Allocating Risks in Public-Private Partnership Contracts
[4]  
Bova Elva, 2016, IMF Working Paper 16/14
[5]  
Brazilian Guarantees Agency (ABGF), INFR GUAR FUND
[6]  
BRICS, 2018, GOOD PRACT PUBL PRIV
[7]  
CAIXA, FUND AP ESTR PROJ CO
[8]  
Cebotari A., 2008, 08245 IMF
[9]  
China Public Private Partnerships Center (CPPPC), DEM PROJ
[10]  
China Public Private Partnerships Center (CPPPC), 2019, NAT PPP INT INF PLAT