Urban development programmes in the context of public administration and urban policy

被引:6
作者
Tosics, I
Dukes, T
机构
[1] Metropolitan Res Inst, HU-1093 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Social & Behav Sci, AMIDSt, NL-1018 VZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
public administration; decentralisation; urban policy-making; area-based policies; Urban Development Programmes; comparative analysis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00471.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
During the last decade, in many European countries and cities, area-based Urban Development Programmes have been initiated, in response to major problems of poverty and social exclusion. Urban Development Programmes are usually developed in a complex interplay between different governmental levels, and implemented by a wide variety of public and non-public parties. This paper addresses the organisation of these programmes, concentrating in particular on the form and extent of `public-public partnership', i.e. on the role that the different levels of the public administration play, both through the administrative system and through policy-making. The `empirical' basis for the paper consists of case studies, derived from the UGIS project (`Urban Governance, Social Inclusion and Sustainability,' a research project financed by the European Commission, DG RTD). The short analysis makes clear that both the model of public administration, in terms of the extent and form of decentralisation, and the presence (or lack) of a national policy framework determine the extent to which UDPs can be planned, approved and implemented at the local level. One of the main findings is that the central influence over UDPs depends more on the urban policy framework of the central government than on the model of public administration of a country. Countries with strong national (regional) urban policies, sufficient decentralisation of public administration to the municipal level and the use of governance methods at the local level open up possibilities for successful UDPs. Without upper-level urban policy frameworks UDPs might be successful as well, but their replicability and the control over their external effects will not be ensured.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 408
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Cities after socialism-urban and regional change and conflist in post-socialist societies
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, NATL URBAN POLICIES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Shifts in governance: problems of legitimacy and accountability
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, METROPOLITAN GOVERNA, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203986493
[5]  
BAAN A, 2004, NATL URBAN POLICIES
[6]  
Balchin P. N., 1999, Regional Policy and Planning in Europe
[7]  
BENNET R, 1989, TERRITORY ADM EUROPE, P33
[8]   Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European union [J].
Brenner, N .
URBAN STUDIES, 1999, 36 (03) :431-451
[9]  
BULLMANN U, 1997, REGIONAL DIMENSION E, P3
[10]  
DUKES T, THESIS U AMSTERDAM