Optimizing Patient Selection for Irreversible Electroporation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Analyses of Survival

被引:9
|
作者
Woeste, Matthew R. [1 ]
Wilson, Khaleel D. [1 ]
Kruse, Edward J. [2 ]
Weiss, Matthew J. [3 ]
Christein, John D. [4 ]
White, Rebekah R. [5 ]
Martin, Robert C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Augusta Univ, Med Ctr, Sect Surg Oncol, Dept Surg, Augusta, GA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Moores Canc Ctr, Gastrointestinal Canc Unit, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 11卷
关键词
locally advanced pancreatic cancer; irreversible electroporation (IRE); overall survival; patient selection; recurrence; progression free survival; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; DIABETES-MELLITUS; PLUS RADIOTHERAPY; TUMOR ABLATION; ADENOCARCINOMA; BORDERLINE; THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; FOLFIRINOX;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.817220
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundIrreversible electroporation (IRE) has emerged as a viable consolidative therapy after induction chemotherapy, in which this combination has improved overall survival of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Optimal timing and patient selection for irreversible electroporation remains a clinically unmet need. The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative factors that may assist in predicting progression-free and overall survival following IRE. MethodsA multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with LAPC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by open-technique irreversible electroporation from 7/2015-5/2019. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess tumor response and radiological progression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier and Cox multivariable regression analyses. Results187 LAPC patients (median age 62 years range, 21 - 91, 65% men, 35% women) were treated with IRE. Median PFS was 21.7 months and median OS from diagnosis was 25.5 months. On multivariable analysis, age <= 61 (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.78, p<0.008) and no prior radiation (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.26-0.94, p=0.03) were positive predictors of OS after IRE. Age <= 61(HR 0.53, 95%CI, 0.28-.99, p=0.046) and FOLFIRINOX followed by gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy (HR 0.37,95%CI 0.15-0.89, p=0.027) predicted prolonged PFS after IRE. Abnormal CA19-9 values at the time of surgery negatively impacted both OS (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.28-4.72, p<0.007) and PFS (HR 2.192, 95%CI 1.143-4.201, p=0.018) following IRE. ConclusionsAge, CA 19-9 response, avoidance of pre-IRE radiation, and FOLFIRINOX plus gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy are prominent factors to consider when referring or selecting LAPC patients to undergo IRE.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic factor analysis of irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer A multi -institutional clinical study in Asia
    Yang, Po-Chih
    Huang, Kai-Wen
    Pua, Uei
    Kim, Man-Deuk
    Li, Sheng-Ping
    Li, Xiao-Yong
    Liang, Po-Chin
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (05): : 811 - 817
  • [22] Irreversible Electroporation for Nonthermal Tumor Ablation in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Initial Clinical Experience in Japan
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Moriyasu, Fuminori
    Tsuchiya, Takayoshi
    Nagakawa, Yuichi
    Hosokawa, Yuichi
    Saito, Kazuhiro
    Tsuchida, Akihiko
    Itoi, Takao
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 57 (22) : 3225 - 3231
  • [23] Quality of life assessment for patients undergoing irreversible electroporation (IRE) for treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)
    Field, Wesley
    Rostas, Jack W.
    Martin, Robert C. G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 218 (03) : 571 - 578
  • [24] Irreversible electroporation after induction chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score matching analysis
    He, Chaobin
    Wang, Jun
    Zhang, Yu
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Li, Shengping
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2020, 20 (03) : 477 - 484
  • [25] Concurrent chemotherapy alone versus irreversible electroporation followed by chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Belfiore, Giuseppe
    Belfiore, Maria Paola
    Reginelli, Alfonso
    Capasso, Raffaella
    Romano, Francesco
    Ianniello, Giovanni Pietro
    Cappabianca, Salvatore
    Brunese, Luca
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 34 (03)
  • [26] Survival Comparison of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Irreversible Electroporation Versus Conversional Resection for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    He, Chaobin
    Sun, Shuxin
    Huang, Xin
    Zhang, Yu
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Li, Shengping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10
  • [27] Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic neck/body adenocarcinoma
    Martin, Robert C. G., II
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 6 (03) : 329 - 335
  • [28] Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Aiming to Improve Overall Survival
    Diego Tristán Enjuto
    Norberto Herrera Merino
    José María Abadal Villandrade
    Esther Gálvez González
    Rosa Llorente Lázaro
    Patricia Díaz Peña
    María Jesús Álvarez Pérez
    Marta Pérez González
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2020, 51 : 1084 - 1087
  • [29] Arterial complication of irreversible electroporation procedure for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Yahya Ekici
    Tugan Tezcaner
    Hüseyin Onur Ayd?n
    Fatih Boyvat
    G?khan Moray
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2016, (10) : 751 - 756
  • [30] Arterial complication of irreversible electroporation procedure for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Ekici, Yahya
    Tezcaner, Tugan
    Aydin, Huseyin Onur
    Boyvat, Fatih
    Moray, Gokhan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 8 (10) : 751 - 756