Optimizing Patient Selection for Irreversible Electroporation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Analyses of Survival

被引:9
|
作者
Woeste, Matthew R. [1 ]
Wilson, Khaleel D. [1 ]
Kruse, Edward J. [2 ]
Weiss, Matthew J. [3 ]
Christein, John D. [4 ]
White, Rebekah R. [5 ]
Martin, Robert C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Augusta Univ, Med Ctr, Sect Surg Oncol, Dept Surg, Augusta, GA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Moores Canc Ctr, Gastrointestinal Canc Unit, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 11卷
关键词
locally advanced pancreatic cancer; irreversible electroporation (IRE); overall survival; patient selection; recurrence; progression free survival; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; DIABETES-MELLITUS; PLUS RADIOTHERAPY; TUMOR ABLATION; ADENOCARCINOMA; BORDERLINE; THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; FOLFIRINOX;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.817220
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundIrreversible electroporation (IRE) has emerged as a viable consolidative therapy after induction chemotherapy, in which this combination has improved overall survival of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Optimal timing and patient selection for irreversible electroporation remains a clinically unmet need. The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative factors that may assist in predicting progression-free and overall survival following IRE. MethodsA multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with LAPC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by open-technique irreversible electroporation from 7/2015-5/2019. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess tumor response and radiological progression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier and Cox multivariable regression analyses. Results187 LAPC patients (median age 62 years range, 21 - 91, 65% men, 35% women) were treated with IRE. Median PFS was 21.7 months and median OS from diagnosis was 25.5 months. On multivariable analysis, age <= 61 (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.78, p<0.008) and no prior radiation (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.26-0.94, p=0.03) were positive predictors of OS after IRE. Age <= 61(HR 0.53, 95%CI, 0.28-.99, p=0.046) and FOLFIRINOX followed by gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy (HR 0.37,95%CI 0.15-0.89, p=0.027) predicted prolonged PFS after IRE. Abnormal CA19-9 values at the time of surgery negatively impacted both OS (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.28-4.72, p<0.007) and PFS (HR 2.192, 95%CI 1.143-4.201, p=0.018) following IRE. ConclusionsAge, CA 19-9 response, avoidance of pre-IRE radiation, and FOLFIRINOX plus gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy are prominent factors to consider when referring or selecting LAPC patients to undergo IRE.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Kwon, Wooil
    Thomas, Alexander
    Kluger, Michael D.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 48 (01) : 84 - 94
  • [2] The Synergistic Role of Irreversible Electroporation and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Gyftopoulos, Argyrios
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Moris, Dimitrios
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [3] Comparison of Survival Between Irreversible Electroporation Followed by Chemotherapy and Chemotherapy Alone for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    He, Chaobin
    Huang, Xin
    Zhang, Yu
    Cai, Zhiyuan
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Li, Shengping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [4] Initial experience of irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer in a Korean population
    Kwon, Joon Ho
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Lee, Hee Seung
    Hwang, Ho Kyoung
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Kim, Namo
    Bang, Seungmin
    Kim, Man-Deuk
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (02) : 164 - 171
  • [5] Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Ma, Yang-Yang
    Leng, Yin
    Xing, Yan-Li
    Li, Hong-Mei
    Chen, Ji-Bing
    Niu, Li-Zhi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2020, 8 (22) : 5564 - 5575
  • [6] Irreversible electroporation versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a propensity score analysis
    He, Chaobin
    Wang, Jun
    Sun, Shuxin
    Zhang, Yu
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Lao, Xiangming
    Cui, Bokang
    Li, Shengping
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [7] Systematic Review of Surgical and Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Moris, Dimitrios
    Machairas, Nikolaos
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Ejaz, Aslam
    Weiss, Matthew
    Hasemaki, Natasha
    Felekouras, Evangelos
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 1657 - 1668
  • [8] Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Potential Improved Overall Survival
    Martin, Robert C. G., II
    McFarland, Kelli
    Ellis, Susan
    Velanovich, Vic
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 : S443 - S449
  • [9] Intraoperative Irreversible Electroporation in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Guide for the Interventional Radiologist
    Frey, Gregory T.
    Padula, Carlos A.
    Stauffer, John A.
    Toskich, Beau B.
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (05) : 386 - 391
  • [10] Sequential Irreversible Electroporation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Ong, Daniel Yuxuan
    Pua, Uei
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (22)