Assessment of benthic invertebrate diversity and river ecological status along an urbanized gradient using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method

被引:33
作者
Ji, Fenfen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Han, Dingyi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yan, Liang [2 ,3 ]
Yan, Saihong [2 ,3 ]
Zha, Jinmiao [2 ,3 ]
Shen, Jianzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Fisheries, Engn Res Ctr Green Dev Convent Aquat Biol Ind Yan, Minist Educ, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Key Lab Drinking Water Sci & Technol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Benthic invertebrate diversity; Ecological status assessment; Environmental DNA metabarcoding; River ecosystems; WATER-QUALITY; LAND-USE; MACROINVERTEBRATE; BIODIVERSITY; INDEXES; ASSEMBLAGES; POLLUTION; IMPACT; SAMPLE; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150587
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Benthic invertebrate diversity is one of the most commonly used bioindicators for assessing aquatic ecosystem health in river systems. Although an increasing number of studies have focused on assessing benthic invertebrate diversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding and traditional survey methods, benthic invertebrate diver-sity and ecological status assessments performed across different landscapes within river systems have not been well documented. Here, the diversity and ecological status of benthic invertebrates and the influence of water quality on the invertebrate assemblage distribution along an urbanization gradient in rivers from the Jingjinji (JJJ) region, China, were investigated using eDNA metabarcoding and the traditional method. With the combination of the two methods, 395 benthic invertebrates from 6 phyla, 27 orders, 94 families, and 222 genera were identified. The species richness of the benthic invertebrate community in the mountain area was significantly higher than that in the urban and agricultural areas. Compared to the traditional results, eDNA metabarcoding obtained a significantly greater number of species from every sampling site (P = 0.000) and detected a notably higher abundance in Annelida (P = 0.000). Furthermore, the nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index indicated that the benthic invertebrate communities from the different habitats were discriminated more accurately and easily using eDNA metabarcoding (P = 0.038) than with the traditional method (P = 0.829). Additionally, the assemblages identified by eDNA metabarcoding were more closely linked to water quality and could be realistically used to assess the ecological status of rivers. Our findings highlight that eDNA metabarcoding could represent a rapid and reliable method for estimating benthic invertebrate diversity and ecological status in river systems. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Uncovering the complete biodiversity structure in spatial networks: the example of riverine systems
    Altermatt, Florian
    Little, Chelsea J.
    Maechler, Elvira
    Wang, Shaopeng
    Zhang, Xiaowei
    Blackman, Rosetta C.
    [J]. OIKOS, 2020, 129 (05) : 607 - 618
  • [2] Anderson MJ, 2001, AUSTRAL ECOL, V26, P32, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x
  • [3] ASTON R J, 1973, Environmental Pollution, V5, P1, DOI 10.1016/0013-9327(73)90050-5
  • [4] Bioinformatic pipelines combining denoising and clustering tools allow for more comprehensive prokaryotic and eukaryotic metabarcoding
    Brandt, Miriam I.
    Trouche, Blandine
    Quintric, Laure
    Gunther, Babett
    Wincker, Patrick
    Poulain, Julie
    Arnaud-Haond, Sophie
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2021, 21 (06) : 1904 - 1921
  • [5] Bush A, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P8539, DOI [10.1073/pnas.1918741117, 10.1073/pnas.1918741117/-/DCSupplemental.]
  • [6] QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
    Caporaso, J. Gregory
    Kuczynski, Justin
    Stombaugh, Jesse
    Bittinger, Kyle
    Bushman, Frederic D.
    Costello, Elizabeth K.
    Fierer, Noah
    Pena, Antonio Gonzalez
    Goodrich, Julia K.
    Gordon, Jeffrey I.
    Huttley, Gavin A.
    Kelley, Scott T.
    Knights, Dan
    Koenig, Jeremy E.
    Ley, Ruth E.
    Lozupone, Catherine A.
    McDonald, Daniel
    Muegge, Brian D.
    Pirrung, Meg
    Reeder, Jens
    Sevinsky, Joel R.
    Tumbaugh, Peter J.
    Walters, William A.
    Widmann, Jeremy
    Yatsunenko, Tanya
    Zaneveld, Jesse
    Knight, Rob
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2010, 7 (05) : 335 - 336
  • [7] Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
    Cardinale, Bradley J.
    Duffy, J. Emmett
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    Hooper, David U.
    Perrings, Charles
    Venail, Patrick
    Narwani, Anita
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Tilman, David
    Wardle, David A.
    Kinzig, Ann P.
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    Loreau, Michel
    Grace, James B.
    Larigauderie, Anne
    Srivastava, Diane S.
    Naeem, Shahid
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 486 (7401) : 59 - 67
  • [8] Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high-diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guianese freshwater fishes
    Cilleros, Kevin
    Valentini, Alice
    Allard, Luc
    Dejean, Tony
    Etienne, Roselyne
    Grenouillet, Gael
    Iribar, Amaia
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Vigouroux, Regis
    Brosse, Sebastien
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2019, 19 (01) : 27 - 46
  • [9] Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information
    Deiner, Kristy
    Fronhofer, Emanuel A.
    Machler, Elvira
    Walser, Jean-Claude
    Altermatt, Florian
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7 : 1 - 9
  • [10] Environmental DNA can act as a biodiversity barometer of anthropogenic pressures in coastal ecosystems
    DiBattista, Joseph D.
    Reimer, James D.
    Stat, Michael
    Masucci, Giovanni D.
    Biondi, Piera
    De Brauwer, Maarten
    Wilkinson, Shaun P.
    Chariton, Anthony A.
    Bunce, Michael
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)