The differential roles of contralesional frontoparietal areas in cortical reorganization after stroke

被引:30
|
作者
Tscherpel, Caroline [1 ,2 ]
Hensel, Lukas [1 ]
Lemberg, Katharina [1 ]
Vollmer, Mattias [1 ]
Volz, Lukas J. [1 ]
Fink, Gereon R. [1 ,2 ]
Grefkes, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Neurol, Cologne, Germany
[2] Res Ctr Julich, Inst Neurosci & Med INM 3, Cognit Neurosci, Julich, Germany
关键词
Premotor cortex; Parietal cortex; Plasticity; Rehabilitation; Recovery of function; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; IPSILATERAL MOTOR CORTEX; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MOVEMENT KINEMATICS; FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY; NEURAL ACTIVITY; RECOVERY; BRAIN; CONNECTIVITY; HEMISPHERE;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.016
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Studies examining the contribution of contralesional brain regions to motor recovery after stroke have revealed conflicting results comprising both supporting and disturbing influences. Especially the relevance of contralesional brain regions beyond primary motor cortex (M1) has rarely been studied, particularly concerning the temporal dynamics post-stroke. Methods: We, therefore, used online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interference to longitudinally assess the role of contralesional (right) frontoparietal areas for recovery of hand motor function after left hemispheric stroke: contralesional M1, contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), and contralesional anterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS). Fourteen stroke patients and sixteen age-matched healthy subjects performed motor tasks of varying complexity with their (paretic) right hand. Motor performance was quantified using three-dimensional kinematic data. All patients were assessed twice, (i) in the first week, and (ii) after more than three months post-stroke. Results: While we did not observe a significant effect of TMS interference on movement kinematics following the stimulation of contralesional M1 and dPMC in the first week post-stroke, we found improvements of motor performance upon interference with contralesional IPS across motor tasks early after stroke, an effect that persisted into the later phase. By contrast, for dPMC, TMS-induced deterioration of motor performance was only evident three months post-stroke, suggesting that a supportive role of contralesional premotor cortex might evolve with reorganization. Conclusion: We here highlight time-sensitive and region-specific effects of contralesional frontoparietal areas after left hemisphere stroke, which may influence on neuromodulation regimes aiming at supporting recovery of motor function post-stroke. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 624
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retraction and replacement: Assessing the cortical microstructure in contralesional sensorimotor areas after stroke
    Wrobel, Pawel P.
    Guder, Stephanie
    Feldheim, Jan F.
    Perez, Jose A. Graterol
    Frey, Benedikt M.
    Choe, Chi-un
    Boenstrup, Marlene
    Cheng, Bastian
    Rathi, Yogesh
    Pasternak, Ofer
    Thomalla, Goetz
    Gerloff, Christian
    Shenton, Martha E.
    Schulz, Robert
    BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 6 (03)
  • [2] Individual contralesional recruitment in the context of structural reserve in early motor reorganization after stroke
    Mustin, Maike
    Hensel, Lukas
    Fink, Gereon R.
    Grefkes, Christian
    Tscherpel, Caroline
    NEUROIMAGE, 2024, 300
  • [3] Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke
    Gerloff, C
    Bushara, K
    Sailer, A
    Wassermann, EM
    Chen, R
    Matsuoka, T
    Waldvogel, D
    Wittenberg, GF
    Ishii, K
    Cohen, LG
    Hallett, M
    BRAIN, 2006, 129 : 791 - 808
  • [4] Differential patterns of cortical reorganization following constraint-induced movement therapy during early and late period after stroke: A preliminary study
    Sawaki, Lumy
    Butler, Andrew J.
    Leng, Xiaoyan
    Wassenaar, Peter A.
    Mohammad, Yousef M.
    Blanton, Sarah
    Sathian, K.
    Nichols-Larsen, Deborah S.
    Wolf, Steven L.
    Good, David C.
    Wittenberg, George F.
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2014, 35 (03) : 415 - 426
  • [5] Contralesional Cortical Structural Reorganization Contributes to Motor Recovery after Sub-Cortical Stroke: A Longitudinal Voxel-Based Morphometry Study
    Cai, Jianxin
    Ji, Qiling
    Xin, Ruiqiang
    Zhang, Dianping
    Na, Xu
    Peng, Ruchen
    Li, Kuncheng
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10 : 8
  • [6] Cortical thickness of contralesional cortices positively relates to future outcome after severe stroke
    Albert, Alina Rojas
    Backhaus, Winifried
    Perez, Jose A. Graterol
    Braass, Hanna
    Schoen, Gerhard
    Choe, Chi-Un
    Feldheim, Jan
    Boenstrup, Marlene
    Cheng, Bastian
    Thomalla, Goetz
    Gerloff, Christian
    Schulz, Robert
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2022, 32 (24) : 5622 - 5627
  • [7] Cortical Reorganization After Stroke: How Much and How Functional?
    Grefkes, Christian
    Ward, Nick S.
    NEUROSCIENTIST, 2014, 20 (01) : 56 - 70
  • [8] Recovered grasping performance after stroke depends on interhemispheric frontoparietal connectivity
    Hensel, Lukas
    Lange, Fabian
    Tscherpel, Caroline
    Viswanathan, Shivakumar
    Freytag, Jana
    Volz, Lukas J.
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    Fink, Gereon R.
    Grefkes, Christian
    BRAIN, 2023, 146 (03) : 1006 - 1020
  • [9] Connectivity-Related Roles of Contralesional Brain Regions for Motor Performance Early after Stroke
    Hensel, Lukas
    Tscherpel, Caroline
    Freytag, Jana
    Ritter, Stella
    Rehme, Anne K.
    Volz, Lukas J.
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    Fink, Gereon R.
    Grefkes, Christian
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2021, 31 (02) : 993 - 1007
  • [10] Cortical reorganization after motor stroke: A pilot study on differences between the upper and lower limbs
    Binder, Ellen
    Leimbach, Martha
    Pool, Eva-Maria
    Volz, Lukas J.
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    Fink, Gereon R.
    Grefkes, Christian
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2021, 42 (04) : 1013 - 1033