In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility

被引:15
|
作者
Levy, Neil [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Philosophy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Uehiro Ctr Pract Eth, Oxford, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Trust; testimony; epistemic injustice; PSYCHOLOGY; REASONS;
D O I
10.1080/02691728.2022.2042420
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Much of what we know we know through testimony, and knowing on the basis of testimony requires some degree of trust in speakers. Trust is therefore very valuable. But in trusting, we expose ourselves to risks of harm and betrayal. It is therefore important to trust well. In this paper, I discuss two recent cases of the betrayal of trust in (broadly) academic contexts: one involving hoax submissions to journals, the other faking an identity on social media. I consider whether these betrayals suggest that we ought to be less trusting in contexts like these. I argue that we should not: the acquisition of knowledge is dependent on trust, and we cannot intentionally reduce the extent to which we trust in these kinds of contexts without risking destroying it utterly. Instead, we must trust in our epistemic networks and the way they work to filter out deception.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 298
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Can we trust robots?
    Mark Coeckelbergh
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2012, 14 : 53 - 60
  • [42] How can I trust you? The role of facial trustworthiness in the development of Epistemic and Interpersonal Trust
    Milesi, Alberto
    De Carli, Pietro
    Locati, Francesca
    Benzi, Ilaria M. A.
    Campbell, Chloe
    Fonagy, Peter
    Parolin, Laura
    HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 67 (02) : 57 - 68
  • [43] Can we trust robots?
    Coeckelbergh, Mark
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 14 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [44] In Certificates We Trust - Revisited
    Reimair, Florian
    Teufl, Peter
    Pruenster, Bernd
    2015 IEEE TRUSTCOM/BIGDATASE/ISPA, VOL 1, 2015, : 702 - 709
  • [45] Trust Beliefs, Biases, and Behaviors in Borderline Personality Disorder: Empirical Findings and Relevance to Epistemic Trust
    Masland, Sara Rose
    Schnell, Sophie Elizabeth
    Shah, Tanya Vikram
    CURRENT BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2020, 7 (04) : 239 - 249
  • [46] In not-for-profits we trust
    Torok Marianna
    CIVIL SZEMLE, 2014, 11 (01): : 43 - +
  • [47] In crowdfunding we trust: A trust-building model in lending crowdfunding
    Moysidou, Krystallia
    Hausberg, J. Piet
    JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 58 (03) : 511 - 543
  • [48] Can we trust trust-based data governance models?
    van der Sloot, Bart
    Keymolen, Esther
    DATA & POLICY, 2022, 4
  • [49] In trust we trust: The impact of trust in government on excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Louis Zaki, Bishoy
    Nicoli, Francesco
    Wayenberg, Ellen
    Verschuere, Bram
    PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 37 (02) : 226 - 252
  • [50] Can We Learn From Trust in Simulation to Gain Trust in AI?
    Tolk, Andreas
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2024,