In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility

被引:15
|
作者
Levy, Neil [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Philosophy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Uehiro Ctr Pract Eth, Oxford, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Trust; testimony; epistemic injustice; PSYCHOLOGY; REASONS;
D O I
10.1080/02691728.2022.2042420
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Much of what we know we know through testimony, and knowing on the basis of testimony requires some degree of trust in speakers. Trust is therefore very valuable. But in trusting, we expose ourselves to risks of harm and betrayal. It is therefore important to trust well. In this paper, I discuss two recent cases of the betrayal of trust in (broadly) academic contexts: one involving hoax submissions to journals, the other faking an identity on social media. I consider whether these betrayals suggest that we ought to be less trusting in contexts like these. I argue that we should not: the acquisition of knowledge is dependent on trust, and we cannot intentionally reduce the extent to which we trust in these kinds of contexts without risking destroying it utterly. Instead, we must trust in our epistemic networks and the way they work to filter out deception.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 298
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条