Comments on real-valued negative selection vs. real-valued positive selection and one-class SVM

被引:7
作者
Stibor, Thomas [1 ]
Timmis, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Dept Comp Sci, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
[2] Univ York, Dept Elect, Dept Comp Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
来源
2007 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-10, PROCEEDINGS | 2007年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/CEC.2007.4424956
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Real-valued negative selection (RVNS) is an immune-inspired technique for anomaly detection problems. It has been claimed that this technique is a competitive approach, comparable to statistical anomaly detection approaches such as one-class Support Vector Machine. Moreover, it has been claimed that the complementary approach to RVNS, termed real-valued positive selection, is not a realistic solution. We investigate these claims and show that these claims can not be sufficiently supported.
引用
收藏
页码:3727 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 27 条