Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

被引:36
作者
Huang, Ding [1 ]
Shen, Jingyi [2 ]
Hong, Jiaze [2 ]
Zhang, Yi [2 ]
Dai, Senjie [2 ]
Du, Nannan [2 ]
Zhang, Mengting [2 ]
Guo, Daxin [3 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Anorectal Hosp, Med Dept, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Clin Med Coll 2, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, HwaMei Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Northwest St 41, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Colonoscopy; Adenoma detection; Polyp detection; Meta-analysis; COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; TIME; RISK; PARTICIPATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-021-04062-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether artificial intelligence (AI) improves colonoscopy outcome metrics i.e. adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods Two authors independently searched Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library to find all published research before July 2021 that has compared AI-aided colonoscopy with routine colonoscopy (RC) for detection of adenoma and polyp. Results This meta-analysis included 10 RCTs with 6629 individuals in AI-aided (n = 3300) and routine (n = 3329) groups. The results showed that both ADR (RR, 1.43; P < 0.001) and PDR (RR, 1.44; P < 0.001) using AI-aided endoscopy were significantly greater when compared with RC. The adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC) (WMD, 0.25; P = 0.009), polyps detected per colonoscopy (PPC) (WMD, 0.52; P < 0.001), and sessile serrated lesions detected per colonoscopy (SSLPC) (RR, 1.53; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the AI-aided group compared with the RC group. Subgroup analysis based on size, location, and shape of adenomas and polyps demonstrated that, except for in the cecum and pedunculated adenomas or polyps, the AI-aided groups of the other subgroups are more advantageous. Withdrawal time was longer in the AI-aided group when biopsies were included, while withdrawal time excluding biopsy time showed no significant difference. Conclusions AI-aided polyp detection system significantly increases lesion detection rate. In addition, lesion detection by AI is hardly affected by factors such as size, location, and shape.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 506
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Ahmad OF, 2019, LANCET GASTROENTEROL, V4, P71, DOI 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30282-6
[2]   The impact of deep convolutional neural network-based artificial intelligence on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Aziz, Muhammad ;
Fatima, Rawish ;
Dong, Charles ;
Lee-Smith, Wade ;
Nawras, Ali .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 (10) :1676-1683
[3]   Improving the ADR: Narrow Band, Broad Benefits [J].
Aziz, Muhammad ;
Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2020, 65 (06) :1586-1587
[4]   Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Barua, Ishita ;
Vinsard, Daniela Guerrero ;
Jodal, Henriette C. ;
Loberg, Magnus ;
Kalager, Mette ;
Holme, Oyvind ;
Misawa, Masashi ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Mori, Yuichi .
ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (03) :277-284
[5]   Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies [J].
Brenner, Hermann ;
Stock, Christian ;
Hoffmeister, Michael .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
[6]   Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection [J].
Buchner, Anna M. ;
Shahid, Muhammad W. ;
Heckman, Michael G. ;
Diehl, Nancy N. ;
McNeil, Rebecca B. ;
Cleveland, Patrick ;
Gill, Kanwar R. ;
Schore, Anthony ;
Ghabril, Marwan ;
Raimondo, Massimo ;
Gross, Seth A. ;
Wallace, Michael B. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (06) :1223-1231
[7]   Association of Colonoscopy Adenoma Findings With Long-term Colorectal Cancer Incidence [J].
Click, Benjamin ;
Pinsky, Paul F. ;
Hickey, Tom ;
Doroudi, Maryam ;
Schoen, Robert E. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (19) :2021-2031
[8]  
Corley DA, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V370, P2541, DOI [10.1056/NEJMoa1309086, 10.1056/NEJMc1405329]
[9]   Artificial intelligence (AI) real-time detection vs. routine colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis [J].
Deliwala, Smit S. ;
Hamid, Kewan ;
Barbarawi, Mahmoud ;
Lakshman, Harini ;
Zayed, Yazan ;
Kandel, Pujan ;
Malladi, Srikanth ;
Singh, Adiraj ;
Bachuwa, Ghassan ;
Gurvits, Grigoriy E. ;
Chawla, Saurabh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (11) :2291-2303
[10]   Colonoscopy outreach increased CRC screening more than FIT outreach; both were better than usual care [J].
Fletcher, Robert H. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 167 (12) :JC65-JC65