Quantitative Risk Assessment of Cut-Slope Projects under Construction

被引:19
|
作者
Li, Zhihong [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Hongwei [1 ]
Nadim, Farrokh [2 ]
Xue, Yadong [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Norwegian Geotech Inst, Int Ctr Geohazards, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Quantitative analysis; Assessment; Risk management; Landslides; Construction; MANAGEMENT; HAZARD; MODEL;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000381
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In some cut-slope projects landslide is a common problem during construction due to unfavorable geomorphological and geomechanical conditions. It is necessary to do a quantitative assessment of the risk posed by landslide before determining the budget or tender price. This paper outlines a general procedure for doing this, followed by an example to demonstrate the approach in comparison to a known failure. Finite-element analyses identify the most dangerous landslide scenario among all construction steps. The slope failure probability is then estimated using reliability theory based on the most dangerous construction step. After identifying the potential failure surface and estimating the volume of the sliding mass, the runnout behavior of sliding mass is simulated to delimit the extent of likely impacted area. Then, the exposed elements at risk and their vulnerabilities are identified and analyzed. The landslide risk is assessed quantitatively for three types of consequences: casualties, economic loss, and time overrun. Compared with actual consequences, the estimation results were in acceptable agreement with the case study. The paper demonstrates that it is feasible to analyze the risk associated with landslides during construction of cut-slopes.
引用
收藏
页码:1644 / 1654
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sustainability risk assessment in mega construction projects
    Coskun, Cansu
    Dikmen, Irem
    Birgonul, M. Talat
    BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROJECT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2023, 13 (05) : 700 - 718
  • [32] THE METHODOLOGY OF RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE PLANNING OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
    Szafranko, Elzbleta
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MANAGEMENT: CITPM 2016, 2016, : 430 - 437
  • [33] The application of quantitative risk assessment in talus slope risk analysis
    Liu, Z. Q.
    Huang, H. W.
    Xue, Y. D.
    GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2009, 3 (03) : 155 - 163
  • [34] A Fuzzy-Based Risk Assessment Methodology for Construction Projects Under Epistemic Uncertainty
    Tarun Kumer Biswas
    Kais Zaman
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2019, 21 : 1221 - 1240
  • [35] A Fuzzy-Based Risk Assessment Methodology for Construction Projects Under Epistemic Uncertainty
    Biswas, Tarun Kumer
    Zaman, Kais
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 21 (04) : 1221 - 1240
  • [36] Quantitative risk assessment model of tunnel construction under passing existing bridges
    School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha
    410004, China
    不详
    410004, China
    Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban), 5 (1862-1868):
  • [37] Effects of Weak Bedding Plane, Fault, and Extreme Rainfall on the Landslide Event of a High Cut-Slope
    Sun, Yiqing
    Li, Deying
    Miao, Fasheng
    She, Xiangjie
    Yang, Shuo
    Xie, Xiaoxu
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (18)
  • [38] RISK ASSESSMENT THROUGH CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ANALYSIS FOR PLANT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
    Kim, Jihye
    Choi, Jaehyun
    SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2014, : 495 - 500
  • [39] A systematic review of quantitative risk analysis in construction of mega projects
    Nabawy, Mohamed
    Khodeir, Laila M.
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (04) : 1403 - 1410
  • [40] Safety risk assessment in construction projects at Hasanuddin University
    Darwis, A. Muflihah
    Nai'em, M. Furqaan
    Thamrin, Yahya
    Noviponiharwani
    Rahmadani, Suci
    Amin, Fauziah
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2021, 35 : S385 - S387