Assessing best practice as a means of innovation

被引:19
作者
Brannan, Tessa [1 ]
Durose, Catherine [1 ]
John, Peter [1 ]
Wolman, Harold [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, IPEG, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] George Washington Univ, George Washington Inst Publ Policy, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/03003930701770405
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
This paper argues that Best Practice and innovation are different, if related activities, with Best Practice being just one of the means by which organisations can innovate. After reviewing the literatures on innovation diffusion and policy transfer, this paper reports the findings of two surveys of Best Practice in English local authorities on, respectively, regeneration and community safety. The paper finds that innovation is related to the CPA, but use of Best Practice is not; that greater capacity affects both innovation and the use of Best Practice; and that there is little link within authorities in the degree of innovation between policy sectors. In evaluating the use of Best Practice, the paper finds that local authorities encounter problems with assessing whether Best Practice is appropriate for their authority and judging whether Best Practice is in fact best practice. With Best Practice guides, the key problem is the difficulty in assessing whether the practice is as effective as the guides suggest and whether it would really work in a particular authority. The paper concludes that more effort could be made to ensure that readers of Best Practice guides can find out how the innovations really work and how they can be adapted to local needs.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 38
页数:16
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND INNOVATION - CASE OF URBAN RENEWAL [J].
AIKEN, M ;
ALFORD, RR .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1970, 35 (04) :650-665
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PUBLIC MANAG REV, DOI DOI 10.1080/1471903042000303328
[3]   Explaining the adoption of innovation: an empirical analysis of public management reform [J].
Boyne, GA ;
Gould-Williams, JS ;
Law, J ;
Walker, RM .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2005, 23 (03) :419-435
[4]  
Crawford A., 1998, Policy Studies, V19, P237
[5]   Polydiffusion in intergovernmental programs - Information diffusion in the school-to-work network [J].
Mossberger, K ;
Hale, K .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2002, 32 (04) :398-422
[6]  
NEWMAN J, 2000, INNOVATION BEST PRAC
[7]  
Newmark AdamJ., 2002, REV POLICY RES, V19, P151, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00269.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1541-1338.2002.TB00269.X]
[8]  
PAGE E, 2004, POLICY STUDY VISITS
[9]  
Rogers EM., 1995, Diffusion of Innovations, V4, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-79868-9_2
[10]  
Rose R., 1991, J PUBLIC POLICY, V11, P3, DOI [10.1017/S0143814X00004906, DOI 10.1017/S0143814X00004906, 10.1017/S0143814X00004918, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00004918, DOI 10.1017/S0143814X00004918]