Adaptive beamlet-based finite-size pencil beam dose calculation for independent verification of IMRT and VMAT

被引:3
作者
Park, Justin C. [1 ]
Li, Jonathan G. [1 ]
Arhjoul, Lahcen [1 ]
Yan, Guanghua [1 ]
Lu, Bo [1 ]
Fan, Qiyong [1 ]
Liu, Chihray [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
pencil beam; finite-size pencil beam dose calculation; dose calculation; IMRT; VMAT; quality assurance; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIATION; MONITOR UNIT CALCULATION; FRACTION ORGAN MOTION; MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CALCULATION ENGINE; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1118/1.4914858
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The use of sophisticated dose calculation procedure in modern radiation therapy treatment planning is inevitable in order to account for complex treatment fields created by multileaf collimators (MLCs). As a consequence, independent volumetric dose verification is time consuming, which affects the efficiency of clinical workflow. In this study, the authors present an efficient adaptive beamlet-based finite-size pencil beam (AB-FSPB) dose calculation algorithm that minimizes the computational procedure while preserving the accuracy. Methods: The computational time of finite-size pencil beam (FSPB) algorithm is proportional to the number of infinitesimal and identical beamlets that constitute an arbitrary field shape. In AB-FSPB, dose distribution from each beamlet is mathematically modeled such that the sizes of beamlets to represent an arbitrary field shape no longer need to be infinitesimal nor identical. As a result, it is possible to represent an arbitrary field shape with combinations of different sized and minimal number of beamlets. In addition, the authors included the model parameters to consider MLC for its rounded edge and transmission. Results: Root mean square error (RMSE) between treatment planning system and conventional FSPB on a 10x10 cm(2) square field using 10x10, 2.5x2.5, and 0.5x0.5 cm(2) beamlet sizes were 4.90%, 3.19%, and 2.87%, respectively, compared with RMSE of 1.10%, 1.11%, and 1.14% for AB-FSPB. This finding holds true for a larger square field size of 25x25 cm(2), where RMSE for 25x25, 2.5x2.5, and 0.5x0.5 cm(2) beamlet sizes were 5.41%, 4.76%, and 3.54% in FSPB, respectively, compared with RMSE of 0.86%, 0.83%, and 0.88% for AB-FSPB. It was found that AB-FSPB could successfully account for the MLC transmissions without major discrepancy. The algorithm was also graphical processing unit (GPU) compatible to maximize its computational speed. For an intensity modulated radiation therapy (similar to 12 segments) and a volumetric modulated arc therapy fields (similar to 90 control points) with a 3D grid size of 2.0x2.0x2.0 mm(3), dose was computed within 3-5 and 10-15 s timeframe, respectively. Conclusions: The authors have developed an efficient adaptive beamlet-based pencil beam dose calculation algorithm. The fast computation nature along with GPU compatibility has shown better performance than conventional FSPB. This enables the implementation of AB-FSPB in the clinical environment for independent volumetric dose verification. (C) 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1836 / 1850
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   A PENCIL BEAM MODEL FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION [J].
AHNESJO, A ;
SAXNER, M ;
TREPP, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) :263-273
[2]   Treatment of lung cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy and image guidance: A case study [J].
Bedford, James L. ;
Hansen, Vibeke Nordmark ;
Mcnair, Helen A. ;
Aitken, Alexandra H. ;
Brock, Juliet E. C. ;
Warrington, Alan P. ;
Brada, Michael .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2008, 47 (07) :1438-1443
[3]   Evidence for a significant timer error on a linear accelerator: consequences for a special therapy application [J].
Biggs, PJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (10) :3139-3143
[4]   Effects of intra-fraction motion on IMRT dose delivery: statistical analysis and simulation [J].
Bortfeld, T ;
Jokivarsi, K ;
Goitein, M ;
Kung, J ;
Jiang, SB .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (13) :2203-2220
[5]   A FINITE-SIZE PENCIL BEAM MODEL FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATIONS IN 3 DIMENSIONS [J].
BOURLAND, JD ;
CHANEY, EL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (06) :1401-1412
[6]   OPTIMIZATION OF RADIATION-THERAPY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF MULTILEAF COLLIMATION [J].
BRAHME, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 25 (02) :373-375
[7]  
Chen Li, 2010, Chin J Cancer, V29, P217
[8]   A dose verification method using a monitor unit matrix for dynamic IMRT on Varian linear accelerators [J].
Chen, XG ;
Yue, NJ ;
Chen, WM ;
Saw, CB ;
Heron, DE ;
Stefanik, D ;
Antemann, R ;
Huq, MS .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (23) :5641-5652
[9]   Independent monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated radiotherapy using the MIMIC multileaf collimator [J].
Chen, Z ;
Xing, L ;
Nath, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (09) :2041-2051
[10]  
Chui C, 2003, PRACTICAL GUIDE INTE