Noncasein nitrogen analysis of ultrafiltration and microfiltration retentate

被引:18
|
作者
Zhang, H. [1 ]
Metzger, L. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Dairy Sci, Brookings, SD 57006 USA
[2] S Dakota State Univ, Midw Dairy Foods Res Ctr, Brookings, SD 57006 USA
关键词
noncasein nitrogen; ultrafiltration retentate; microfiltration retentate; pH; CALCIUM-INDUCED SOLUBILITY; CASEIN MICELLE; SKIM MILK; PROTEIN; ELECTROPHORESIS; CHEESE;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2010-3690
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Previous research has suggested that the standard noncasein nitrogen (NCN) measurement method for milk overestimates the NCN content of microfiltration (MF) retentate. The objective of this study was to develop a modified method to more accurately measure the NCN content of ultrafiltration and MF retentate products. The standard method is based on precipitation of casein micelles at their isoelectric point (4.6) with acetic acid. In the standard method, a 10-mL milk sample and 75 mL of 38 degrees C water are placed in a 100-mL volumetric flask. One milliliter of 10% acetic acid solution is added and the flask is incubated at 38 C for 10 min. Subsequently, 1 mL of 1N sodium acetate solution is added and mixed. After cooling the contents to 20 degrees C, the flask is made up to 100 mL with water, mixed, and then filtered (Whatman No. 1 filter paper). The N content of the filtrate is then determined by Kjeldahl analysis and referred to as NCN. A method was developed that used a 50-mL centrifugal tube instead of a volumetric flask. This modification facilitated measurement of the pH after addition of acetic acid. Subsequently, the sample was centrifuged (800 x g at 25 degrees C) for 10 min to facilitate filtration with a smaller pore size filter paper (Whatman no. 6). In this study, we evaluated the effect of pH after addition of 1% acetic acid and pH of the final filtrate on NCN analysis. Four pH levels after acetic acid addition (4.0, 4.2, 4.4, and 4.6) and 2 pH levels after sodium acetate addition (4.6 and 4.8) were evaluated. As the pH after acetic acid addition was increased from 4.0 to 4.6, the NCN content significantly decreased. Sodium dodecyl sulfate PAGE results also indicated that the casein fractions present in the filtrate were significantly decreased when the pH was increased from 4.0 to 4.6. The NCN content slightly decreased but the difference was not significant when the final pH of the filtrate was increased from 4.6 to 4.8. Subsequently, the NCN contents of several ultrafiltration and MF samples were determined using the standard method and modified method. The modified method gave significantly lower NCN values for most samples as compared with the standard method.
引用
收藏
页码:2118 / 2125
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A SPREAD FOR BREAKFAST BASED ON AN ULTRAFILTRATION RETENTATE OBTAINED FROM MILK
    DELBEKE, R
    TRAEST, P
    LANDBOUWTIJDSCHRIFT-REVUE DE L AGRICULTURE, 1992, 45 (01): : 103 - 115
  • [12] Comparison of microfiltration and ultrafiltration for algae harvesting
    Sun, X. F.
    Wang, C. W.
    Tong, Y. J.
    Wang, W. G.
    Wei, J.
    EUROMEMBRANE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, 44 : 2108 - 2111
  • [13] DIAFILTRATION OF ULTRAFILTRATION RETENTATE OF WHEY FROM WHITE BRINED CHEESE
    Dushkova, Maria
    Menkov, Nikolay
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 13 (01): : 21 - 33
  • [14] Stormwater management by microfiltration and ultrafiltration treatment
    Ortega Sandoval, Abby Daniela
    Briao, Vandre Barbosa
    Cartana Fernandes, Vera Maria
    Hemkemeier, Augusto
    Friedrich, Maria Tereza
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2019, 30
  • [15] HYDROPHOBICITY MEASUREMENTS OF MICROFILTRATION AND ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES
    KEURENTJES, JTF
    HARBRECHT, JG
    BRINKMAN, D
    HANEMAAIJER, JH
    STUART, MAC
    VANTRIET, K
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1989, 47 (03) : 333 - 344
  • [16] FT-IR analysis of BSA fouled on ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes
    Maruyama, T
    Katoh, S
    Nakajima, M
    Nabetani, H
    Abbott, TP
    Shono, A
    Satoh, K
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2001, 192 (1-2) : 201 - 207
  • [17] Whey concentration using microfiltration and ultrafiltration
    Cancino, Beatriz
    Espina, Valentina
    Orellana, Claudia
    DESALINATION, 2006, 200 (1-3) : 557 - 558
  • [18] DEFINITION BETWEEN ULTRAFILTRATION AND MICROFILTRATION MEMBRANES
    TIETGENS, B
    GROBE, V
    CHEMISCHE TECHNIK, 1985, 37 (09): : 395 - 395
  • [19] Microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes for drinking water
    Alspach, Brent
    Adham, Samer
    Cooke, Trevor
    Delphos, Paul
    Garcia-Aleman, Jesus
    Jacangelo, Joe
    Karimi, Ali
    Pressman, Jonathan
    Schaefer, Jim
    Sethi, Sandeep
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2008, 100 (12): : 84 - 97
  • [20] Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration Membrane Science and Technology
    Escobar, Isabel C.
    Van der Bruggen, Bart
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2015, 132 (21)