Forecasting evapotranspiration in different climates using ensembles of recurrent neural networks

被引:127
作者
Granata, Francesco [1 ]
Di Nunno, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cassino & Southern Lazio, Dept Civil & Mech Engn DICEM, Via Biasio 43, I-03043 Cassino, Frosinone, Italy
关键词
Evapotranspiration; Ensemble models; Deep learning; LSTM; NARX; Forecasting; EXTREME LEARNING-MACHINE; EVAPORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107040
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Accurate ahead evapotranspiration forecasting is crucial for irrigation planning, for wetlands, agricultural and forest habitats preservation, and for water resource management. Deep learning algorithms can be used to develop effective forecasting models of ahead evapotranspiration. In this study, three Recurrent Neural Networkbased models were built for the prediction of short term ahead actual evapotranspiration. Two variants of each model were developed changing the employed algorithm, selecting between long short-term memory (LSTM) and nonlinear autoregressive network with exogenous inputs (NARX), while the modeling was performed in the context of an ensemble approach. The prediction models were trained and tested using data from two sites with different climates: Cypress Swamp, southern Florida, and Kobeh Valley, central Nevada. With reference to the subtropical climatic conditions of South Florida, LSTM models proved to be more accurate than NARX models, while some exogenous variables such as sensible heat flux and relative humidity did not affect the results significantly. An increase of the forecast horizon from 1 to 7 days resulted in a slight reduction in the accuracy of both the LSTM- and NARX based models. Considering instead the semi-arid climate of Central Nevada, NARX models generally provided more accurate results, which were only slightly affected by relative humidity, sensible heat flux, and forecast horizon. On the other hand, LSTM models performance decayed if sensible heat flux and relative humidity were neglected, and if the forecast horizon was increased from 1 to 7 days. Deep learning-based models can provide very accurate predictions of actual evapotranspiration, but the performance of the models can be significantly affected by local climatic conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]  
Harrill J.R., 1983, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, P49
[22]  
Hochreiter S., 1997, Neural Computation, V9, P1735
[23]  
Jacovides C., 1991, Water Resources Management, V5, P305, DOI 10.1007/BF00421999
[24]  
Kim P., 2020, MATLAB Deep Learning
[25]   Modelling reference evapotranspiration using a new wavelet conjunction heuristic method: Wavelet extreme learning machine vs wavelet neural networks [J].
Kisi, Ozgur ;
Alizamir, Meysam .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2018, 263 :41-48
[26]  
Kotu V, 2019, DATA SCI, V2nd, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-814761-0.00002-2, 10.1016/B978-0-12-814761-0.00002-2]
[27]   Forecasting Weekly Evapotranspiration with ARIMA and Artificial Neural Network Models [J].
Landeras, Gorka ;
Ortiz-Barredo, Amaia ;
Javier Lopez, Jose .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (03) :323-334
[28]   Learning long-term dependencies in NARX recurrent neural networks [J].
Lin, TN ;
Horne, BG ;
Tino, P ;
Giles, CL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1996, 7 (06) :1329-1338
[29]   Medium Range Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Forecasting by Using ANN and Public Weather Forecasts [J].
Luo, Yufeng ;
Traore, Seydou ;
Lyu, Xinwei ;
Wang, Weiguang ;
Wang, Ying ;
Xie, Yongyu ;
Jiao, Xiyun ;
Fipps, Guy .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (10) :3863-3876
[30]  
MACKAY DJC, 1992, NEURAL COMPUT, V4, P415, DOI [10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415, 10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.448]