Evidence-based strategy for dental biofilms: Current evidence of mouthwashes on dental biofilm and gingivitis

被引:71
作者
Takenaka, Shoji [1 ]
Ohsumi, Tatsuya [1 ]
Noiri, Yuichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Niigata Univ, Div Cariol Operat Dent & Endodont, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Chuo Ku, 2-5274 Gakkocho Dori, Niigata 9518514, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Dental biofilm; Mouthwash; Chemical control; Gingivitis; Dental caries; ESSENTIAL-OILS; CHLORHEXIDINE MOUTHRINSE; PLAQUE; INFLAMMATION; METAANALYSES; BACTERIA; FLUORIDE; 0.2-PERCENT; ANTIPLAQUE; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.07.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Therapeutic mouthwash (MW) is an adjunctive tool along with a regular oral hygiene routine of daily tooth brushing and daily flossing. Previous systematic reviews have demonstrated that it is effective against dental biofilm and gingival inflammation, for prevention of dental caries, and for managing one's bad breath condition according to the active ingredients. MWs prevent the microorganisms from bacterial adhesion that corresponds to the initial step in biofilm formation. This review summarized the current state of evidence such as anti-biofilm, anti-gingivitis and cariostatic properties of MWs by evaluating systematic reviews from the past six years. The anti-biofilm property has been proven to be effective, with strong evidence of three main clinical efficacies. The most commonly studied active agent was chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), followed by essential oil (EO) and cetylpyridinium chloride. All the systematic reviews are in complete agreement that CHX and EO provide statistically significant improvements in terms of plaque and gingival indices. These effects have held up over the years as the number of studies has increased. While the use of fluoride MW is proven to be effective in improving the oral health of both children and adults, the quality of evidence is still regarded as low. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Association for Dental Science.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   A meta-analysis of six-month studies of antiplaque and antigingivitis agents [J].
Gunsolley, John C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 137 (12) :1649-1657
[12]   Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses [J].
Gunsolley, John C. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2010, 38 :S6-S10
[13]   Essential oils-containing mouthwashes for gingivitis and plaque: Meta-analyses and meta-regression [J].
Haas, Alex Nogueira ;
Wagner, Tassiane Panta ;
Mustafa Gomes Muniz, Francisco Wilker ;
Fiorini, Tiago ;
Cavagni, Juliano ;
Celeste, Roger Keller .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 55 :7-15
[14]  
Haps S, 2008, Int J Dent Hyg, V6, P290, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00344.x
[15]   A clinical guide to periodontology: Pathology of periodontal disease [J].
Hasan, A. ;
Palmer, R. M. .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2014, 216 (08) :457-461
[16]   Comparing the effect of 0.06% -, 0.12% and 0.2% Chlorhexidine on plaque, bleeding and side effects in an experimental gingivitis model: a parallel group, double masked randomized clinical trial [J].
Haydari, Maliha ;
Bardakci, Ayse Gul ;
Koldsland, Odd Carsten ;
Aass, Anne Merete ;
Sandvik, Leiv ;
Preus, Hans R. .
BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2017, 17
[17]   The effects of hydrogen peroxide mouthwashes on the prevention of plaque and gingival inflammation: a systematic review [J].
Hossainian, N. ;
Slot, D. E. ;
Afennich, F. ;
Van der Weijden, G. A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE, 2011, 9 (03) :171-181
[18]   Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health [J].
James, Patrice ;
Worthington, Helen V. ;
Parnell, Carmel ;
Harding, Mairead ;
Lamont, Thomas ;
Cheung, Andrea ;
Whelton, Helen ;
Riley, Philip .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (03)
[19]   Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? [J].
Jones, CG .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 1997, 15 :55-62
[20]   Subgingival biofilm formation [J].
Kuboniwa, Masae ;
Lamont, Richard J. .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2010, 52 :38-52