Evidence-based strategy for dental biofilms: Current evidence of mouthwashes on dental biofilm and gingivitis

被引:71
作者
Takenaka, Shoji [1 ]
Ohsumi, Tatsuya [1 ]
Noiri, Yuichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Niigata Univ, Div Cariol Operat Dent & Endodont, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Chuo Ku, 2-5274 Gakkocho Dori, Niigata 9518514, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Dental biofilm; Mouthwash; Chemical control; Gingivitis; Dental caries; ESSENTIAL-OILS; CHLORHEXIDINE MOUTHRINSE; PLAQUE; INFLAMMATION; METAANALYSES; BACTERIA; FLUORIDE; 0.2-PERCENT; ANTIPLAQUE; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.07.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Therapeutic mouthwash (MW) is an adjunctive tool along with a regular oral hygiene routine of daily tooth brushing and daily flossing. Previous systematic reviews have demonstrated that it is effective against dental biofilm and gingival inflammation, for prevention of dental caries, and for managing one's bad breath condition according to the active ingredients. MWs prevent the microorganisms from bacterial adhesion that corresponds to the initial step in biofilm formation. This review summarized the current state of evidence such as anti-biofilm, anti-gingivitis and cariostatic properties of MWs by evaluating systematic reviews from the past six years. The anti-biofilm property has been proven to be effective, with strong evidence of three main clinical efficacies. The most commonly studied active agent was chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), followed by essential oil (EO) and cetylpyridinium chloride. All the systematic reviews are in complete agreement that CHX and EO provide statistically significant improvements in terms of plaque and gingival indices. These effects have held up over the years as the number of studies has increased. While the use of fluoride MW is proven to be effective in improving the oral health of both children and adults, the quality of evidence is still regarded as low. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Association for Dental Science.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Meta-analyses of studies of 0.2% delmopinol mouth rinse as an adjunct to gingival health and plaque control measures [J].
Addy, Martin ;
Moran, John ;
Newcombe, Robert G. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2007, 34 (01) :58-65
[2]   The effect of hexetidine mouthwash on the prevention of plaque and gingival inflammation: a systematic review [J].
Afennich, F. ;
Slot, D. E. ;
Hossainian, N. ;
Van der Weijden, G. A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE, 2011, 9 (03) :182-190
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, J Am Dent Assoc, V112, P529
[4]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[5]   The efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse compared with 0.2% on plaque accumulation and periodontal parameters: a systematic review [J].
Berchier, C. E. ;
Slot, D. E. ;
Van der Weijden, G. A. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 37 (09) :829-839
[6]  
Berchier C E, 2008, Int J Dent Hyg, V6, P265, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00336.x
[7]  
Boyle P, 2014, ORAL DIS, P1
[8]   The oral environment: the challenge for antimicrobials in oral care products [J].
Brading, MG ;
Marsh, PD .
INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2003, 53 (06) :353-362
[9]   Battling biofilms - The war is against bacterial colonies that cause some of the most tenacious infections known. The weapon is knowledge of the enemy's communication system [J].
Costerton, JW ;
Stewart, PS .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2001, 285 (01) :74-81
[10]   Efficacy of adjunctive anti-plaque chemical agents: a systematic review and network meta-analyses of the Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index [J].
Escribano, Marta ;
Figuero, Elena ;
Martin, Conchita ;
Tobias, Aurelio ;
Serrano, Jorge ;
Roldan, Silvia ;
Herrera, David .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 43 (12) :1059-1073