Combining multi-criteria decision analysis and design thinking

被引:3
作者
Geldermann, Jutta [1 ,2 ]
Lerche, Nils [1 ]
Sepulveda, Juan David [1 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Fac Econ Sci, Chair Prod & Logist, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Fac Engn, Chair Business Adm & Prod Management, Duisburg, Germany
关键词
multi-criteria decision analysis; MCDA; multi-criteria decision making; design thinking process; design thinking tools; structured decision process; PROMETHEE; IDEO; d.school; participation; rapid prototyping; PROBLEM STRUCTURING METHODS; REFLECTIONS;
D O I
10.1504/EJIE.2018.10015684
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Design thinking (DT) has attracted much attention in management practice as a novel problem-solving methodology. It supports and encourages collaborative creativity to solve problems in a holistically and user-centred way. Although there are similarities between DT and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), such as the process orientation and stakeholder participation, there are also differences. Whereas DT mainly focuses on the innovative creation of a prototype, MCDA concentrates instead on the ranking of alternatives. In this paper, we analyse the similarities and differences of DT and MCDA. Based on this analysis, we then develop an approach to integrate elements from DT into MCDA. The stepwise procedure of the adjusted decision process from MCDA is presented in detail. Here, the approach of rapid prototyping from DT is of particular interest. Finally, we discuss the opportunities and challenges of combining multi-criteria decision analysis and design thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:708 / 739
页数:32
相关论文
共 73 条
[41]  
2-P]
[42]   Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management [J].
Lahdelma, R ;
Salminen, P ;
Hokkanen, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (06) :595-605
[43]   Using methods of Multi-Criteria Decision Making to provide decision support concerning local bioenergy projects [J].
Lerche, Nils ;
Wilkens, Ines ;
Schmehl, Meike ;
Eigner-Thiel, Swantje ;
Geldermann, Jutta .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2019, 68
[44]   Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes through Cognitive Bias Reduction [J].
Liedtka, Jeanne .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 32 (06) :925-938
[45]   Rank Reversal in the PROMETHEE II Method: Some New Results [J].
Mareschal, B. ;
De Smet, Y. ;
Nemery, P. .
IEEM: 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-3, 2008, :959-+
[46]   The Decision Analysis Interview Approach in the Collaborative Management of a Large Regulated Water Course [J].
Marttunen, Mika ;
Hamalainen, Raimo P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 42 (06) :1026-1042
[47]   Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations [J].
Marttunen, Mika ;
Lienert, Judit ;
Belton, Valerie .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 263 (01) :1-17
[48]   How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach [J].
Marttunen, Mika ;
Mustajoki, Jyri ;
Dufva, Mikko ;
Karjalainen, Timo P. .
EURO JOURNAL ON DECISION PROCESSES, 2015, 3 (1-2) :187-214
[49]   Combining local preferences with multi-criteria decision analysis and linear optimization to develop feasible energy concepts in small communities [J].
McKenna, R. ;
Bertsch, V. ;
Mainzer, K. ;
Fichtner, W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 268 (03) :1092-1110
[50]   Problem structuring methods in action [J].
Mingers, J ;
Rosenhead, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 152 (03) :530-554