Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-Up The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial

被引:432
作者
Varma, Niraj [1 ]
Epstein, Andrew E. [2 ]
Irimpen, Anand [3 ]
Schweikert, Robert [4 ]
Love, Charles [5 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Tulane Univ, Med Ctr, New Orleans, LA USA
[4] Akron Gen Med Ctr, Akron, OH USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Davis Heart & Lung Res Inst, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
defibrillators; follow-up; patient monitoring; pacemaker; artificial; remote monitoring; SOCIETY TASK-FORCE; PERFORMANCE POLICIES; RECOMMENDATIONS; WIRELESS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937409
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Monitoring implantable cardiac device function and patient condition is important. The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) trial tested the hypothesis that remote home monitoring with automatic daily surveillance (HM) is safe and effective for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up for 1 year and enables rapid physician evaluation of significant events. Methods and Results-In total, 1339 patients were randomized 2:1 to HM or conventional follow-up. Follow-up checks occurred at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months after implantation. HM was used before office visits at 3 and 15 months in the HM group. At 6, 9, and 12 months, HM only was used but was followed by office visits if necessary. Conventional patients were evaluated with office visits only. Scheduled office visits and unscheduled evaluations, incidence of morbidity, and time elapsed from first event occurrence in each patient to physician evaluation were tracked for each group. HM and conventional patients were similar (age, 63.3 +/- 12.8 versus 64.0 +/- 12.1 years; gender, 72.0% versus 73.1% male; New York Heart Association class II, 55.9% versus 60.4%; pathology: left ventricular ejection fraction, 29.0 +/- 10.7% versus 28.5 +/- 9.8%; coronary artery disease, 64.8% versus 71.7%; primary prevention indication, 72.2% versus 73.8%; and dual-chamber implants, 57.8% versus 56.6%). HM reduced total in-hospital device evaluations by 45% without affecting morbidity. In the HM group, 85.8% of all 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-ups were performed remotely only, indicating that HM provided sufficient assessment in the majority. Median time to evaluation was <2 days in the HM group compared with 36 days in the conventional group (P<0.001) for all arrhythmic events. Conclusions-HM is safe and allows more rapid detection of actionable events compared with conventional monitoring in patients with implantable electronic cardiac devices.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / U28
页数:12
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Bonow RO, 2008, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V52, pE1, DOI [10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.04.014, 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007]
[2]   What evidence do we have to replace in-hospital implantable cardioverter clefibrillator follow-up? [J].
Brugada, P .
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 95 (Suppl 3) :3-9
[3]   Recommendations from the Heart Rhythm Society Task Force on device performance policies and guidelines [J].
Carlson, Mark D. ;
Wilkoff, Bruce L. ;
Maisel, William H. ;
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. ;
Saxon, Leslie A. ;
Prystowsky, Eric N. ;
Alpert, Joseph S. ;
Cain, Michael E. ;
Ching, Elizabeth A. ;
Curtis, Anne B. ;
Davies, D. Wyn ;
Hammill, Stephen C. ;
Hauser, Robert G. ;
Lampert, Rachel ;
Zipes, Douglas P. .
HEART RHYTHM, 2006, 3 (10) :1250-1273
[4]   Clinical Benefits of Remote Versus Transtelephonic Monitoring of Implanted Pacemakers [J].
Crossley, George H. ;
Chen, Jane ;
Choucair, Wassim ;
Cohen, Todd J. ;
Gohn, Douglas C. ;
Ben Johnson, W. ;
Kennedy, Eleanor E. ;
Mongeon, Luc R. ;
Serwer, Gerald A. ;
Qiao, Hongyan ;
Wilkoff, Bruce L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (22) :2012-2019
[5]   Remote interrogation and monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators [J].
Joseph, GK ;
Wilkoff, BL ;
Dresing, T ;
Burkhardt, J ;
Khaykin, Y .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (02) :161-166
[6]  
Lazarus A, 2007, PACE, V30, pS2
[7]   Recommendations from the Heart Rhythm Society Task Force on Lead Performance Policies and Guidelines [J].
Maisel, William H. ;
Hauser, Robert G. ;
Hammil, Stephen C. ;
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. ;
Epstein, Andrew E. ;
Hayes, David L. ;
Alpert, Joseph S. ;
Berger, Ronald D. ;
Curtis, Anne B. ;
Dubin, Anne M. ;
Estes, N. A. Mark, III ;
Gura, Melanie T. ;
Krahn, Andrew D. ;
Lampert, Rachel ;
Lindsay, Bruce D. ;
Wilkoff, Bruce L. .
HEART RHYTHM, 2009, 6 (06) :869-885
[8]  
Medtronic, 2007, PHYS ADV LETT URG ME
[9]   Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A prospective analysis [J].
Schoenfeld, MH ;
Compton, SJ ;
Mead, RH ;
Weiss, DN ;
Sherfesee, L ;
Englund, J ;
Mongeon, LR .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 27 (06) :757-763
[10]   Detection of atrial fibrillation by implanted devices with wireless data transmission capability [J].
Varma, N ;
Stambler, B ;
Chun, S .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 :S133-S136