A different fixation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty may lead to preservation of femoral bone stock

被引:17
作者
Barink, M [1 ]
Verdonschot, N [1 ]
Malefijt, MD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Orthopaed, Orthopaed Res Lab, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; finite element; bone remodelling; polished anterior flange;
D O I
10.1243/095441103770802487
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Good femoral bone stock is important for the stability of the femoral component in revision knee arthroplasty. However, the primary total knee replacement (TKR) may cause significant loss of bone stock in the distal anterior femur. Earlier stress-induced bone remodelling Simulations have suggested that a completely debonded component may save bone stock in the distal anterior region. However, these simulations did not consider the fixation of a debonded implant and possible secondary effects of micromotions and osteolysis at the interface. The current study tries to combine the preservation of bone stock with adequate component fixation. Different bone remodelling simulations were performed around femoral knee components with different sizes of bonding area and different friction characteristics of the debonded area. The fixation of the femoral component with different bonding characteristics is quantified with calculated implant-bone interface stresses. The results show that a bonded femoral component with a debonded inner side of the anterior flange may significantly reduce bone resorption in the endangered distal anterior femur, without jeopardizing the fixation of the femoral implant. This effect may be obtained in vivo by using a femoral component with a highly polished inner side of the anterior flange.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 332
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
EZZET KA, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P86
[2]  
HAMPTON SJ, 1981, THESIS U ILLINOIS CH, P81
[3]   Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling [J].
Kerner, J ;
Huiskes, R ;
van Lenthe, GH ;
Weinans, H ;
van Rietbergen, B ;
Engh, CA ;
Amis, AA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (07) :695-703
[4]   MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STEM-CEMENT INTERFACE [J].
MANN, KA ;
BARTEL, DL ;
WRIGHT, TM ;
INGRAFFEA, AR .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1991, 9 (06) :798-808
[5]  
MINTZER CM, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P135
[6]  
Petersen M M, 1995, J Arthroplasty, V10, P7
[7]   Calculated stress-shielding in the distal femur after total knee replacement corresponds to the reported location of bone loss [J].
Tissakht, M ;
Ahmed, AM ;
Chan, KC .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1996, 14 (05) :778-785
[8]   Distal femoral bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison with general bone mineral density [J].
van Loon, CJM ;
Oyen, WJG ;
Malefijt, MCD ;
Verdonschot, N .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2001, 121 (05) :282-285
[9]   Stress shielding after total knee replacement may cause bone resorption in the distal femur [J].
vanLenthe, GH ;
Malefijt, MCD ;
Huiskes, R .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (01) :117-122
[10]  
VANLOON CJM, 2000, THESIS U NIJMEGEN NI