Exergy analysis of a circulating fluidized bed power plant co-firing with olive pits: A case study of power plant in Turkey

被引：59

作者：

Topal, Huseyin ^{[1
]}

Taner, Tolga ^{[2
]}

Naqvi, Syed Arslan Hassan ^{[3
]}

Altinsoy, Yelda ^{[1
]}

Amirabedin, Ehsan ^{[1
]}

Ozkaymak, Mehmet ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkey

[2] Aksaray Univ, Vocat Sch Tech Sci, Dept Motor Vehicles & Transportat Technol, TR-68100 Aksaray, Turkey

[3] Aksaray Univ, Vocat Sch Tech Sci, Dept Mech & Met Technol, TR-68100 Aksaray, Turkey

[4] Karabuk Univ, Fac Technol, Dept Energy Syst Engn, TR-78050 Karabuk, Turkey

来源：

ENERGY | 2017年 / 140卷

关键词：

Co-combustion; Biomass; Co-firing; Circulating fluidized bed; Exergy; Sensitivity analysis; TECHNOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS COCOMBUSTION; EMISSION REDUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; OIL INDUSTRY; COMBUSTION; GASIFIER; IMPACT; TECHNOLOGIES; GAS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.042

中图分类号：

O414.1 [热力学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The effects of the above-mentioned parameters on exergy destruction, and CO2 emission of the power plant are determined for circulating fluidized bed power plant co-firing. The aim of this study is to perform thermodynamic analysis on can Circulating Fluidized Bed Power Plant (CFBPP) co-fired with olive pits. The results of this study also show that the total exergy damage of the plant is about 295 MW and the net exergy yield is 31.26%. The majority (252.40 MW) of exergy destruction occurs in the main boiler and accounts for 86.05% of the total exergy breakdown of CFBPP through exergy analysis. The results show that CFBPP has an effective feature of biomass supplement for exergetic performance and CO2 emissions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：40 / 46

页数：7

共 32 条

[1] A review of biomass co-firing in North America [J].

Agbor, Ezinwa ;

Zhang, Xiaolei ;

Kumar, Amit .

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 40 :930-943

[2] Syngas production and combustion characteristics in a biomass fixed bed gasifier with cyclone combustor [J].

Al-attab, K. A. ;

Zainal, Z. A. .

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 113 :714-721

[3] Co-combustion of coal and olive oil industry residues in fluidised bed [J].

Armesto, L ;

Bahillo, A ;

Cabanillas, A ;

Veijonen, K ;

Otero, J ;

Plumed, A ;

Salvador, L .

FUEL, 2003, 82 (08) :993-1000

[4] Biomass energy and biochemical conversion processing for fuels and chemicals [J].

Balat, M .

ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2006, 28 (06) :517-525

[5] Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants [J].

Basu, Prabir ;

Butler, James ;

Leon, Mathias A. .

RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) :282-288

[6] Biomass-coal co-combustion: opportunity for affordable renewable energy [J].

Baxter, L .

FUEL, 2005, 84 (10) :1295-1302

[7]

Bejan A., 2006, ADV ENG THERMODYNAMI

[8]

Bejan A.T., 1995, Thermal Design and Optimization

[9] Fourier transform method for sensitivity analysis in coal fired power plant [J].

Bresolin, Cirilo S. ;

Diniz da Costa, Joao C. ;

Rudolph, Victor ;

Schneider, Paulo Smith .

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 48 (10) :2699-2707

[10] Impact of cofiring biomass with coal in power plants - A techno-economic assessment [J].

De, S. ;

Assadi, M. .

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (02) :283-293

← 1 2 3 4 →