Flavored Peccei-Quinn symmetry

被引:37
|
作者
Ahn, Y. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] KIAS, Sch Phys, Seoul 130722, South Korea
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2015年 / 91卷 / 05期
关键词
DOUBLE-BETA-DECAY; STRONG CP PROBLEM; DISCRETE SYMMETRY; MASS MATRICES; QUARK MASSES; NEUTRINO; A(4); LEPTOGENESIS; CONSERVATION; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.91.056005
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
In an attempt to uncover any underlying physics in the standard model (SM), we suggest mu-tau power law in the lepton sector, such that relatively large 13 mixing angle with bilarge ones can be derived. On the basis of this, we propose a neat and economical model for both the fermion mass hierarchy problem of the SM and a solution to the strong charge parity (CP) problem, in a way that no domain wall problem occurs, based on A(4) x U(1)(X) symmetry in a supersymmetric framework. Here we refer to the global U(1)(X) symmetry that can explain the above problems as "flavored Peccei-Quinn symmetry." In the model, a direct coupling of the SM gauge singlet flavon fields responsible for spontaneous symmetry breaking to ordinary quarks and leptons, both of which are charged under U(1)(X), comes to pass through Yukawa interactions, and all vacuum expectation values breaking the symmetries are connected to each other. So the scale of Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking is shown to be roughly located around the 10(12) GeV section through its connection to the fermion masses. The model predictions are shown to lie on the testable regions in the very near future through on-going experiments for neutrino oscillation, neutrinoless double beta decay, and the axion. We examine the model predictions, arisen from the mu-tau power law, on leptonic CP violation, neutrinoless double beta decay, and atmospheric mixing angle, and show that the fermion mass and mixing hierarchies are in good agreement with the present data. Interestingly, we show the model predictions on the axion mass m(a) similar or equal to 2.53 x 10(-5) eV and the axion coupling to photon g(a gamma gamma) similar or equal to 1.33 x 10(-15) GeV-1. And subsequently the square of the ratio between them is shown to be one or two orders of magnitude lower than that of the conventional axion model.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Metastable supersymmetry breaking in terms of Peccei-Quinn mechanism
    Yoshimatsu, Nobuki
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2018, 782 : 268 - 274
  • [22] Dynamical generation of the Peccei-Quinn scale in gauge mediation
    Festuccia, Guido
    Opferkuch, Toby
    Ubaldi, Lorenzo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2015, 92 (01):
  • [23] Singlet fermion dark matter and Dirac neutrinos from Peccei-Quinn symmetry
    Carvajal, Cristian D. R.
    Longas, Robinson
    Rodriguez, Oscar
    Zapata, Oscar
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 105 (01)
  • [24] Cosmological effects of Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking on QCD axion dark matter
    Jeong, Kwang Sik
    Matsukawa, Kohei
    Nakagawa, Shota
    Takahashi, Fuminobu
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2022, (03):
  • [25] A minimal non-supersymmetric SO(10) model with Peccei-Quinn symmetry
    Boucenna, Sofiane M.
    Ohlsson, Tommy
    Pernow, Marcus
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2019, 792 : 251 - 257
  • [26] Natural little hierarchy for SUSY from radiative breaking of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry
    Bae, Kyu Jung
    Baer, Howard
    Serce, Hasan
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2015, 91 (01)
  • [27] U(1) flavour symmetries as Peccei-Quinn symmetries
    Bjoerkeroth, Fredrik
    Di Luzio, Luca
    Mescia, Federico
    Nardi, Enrico
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2019, 2019 (02)
  • [28] Bringing the Peccei-Quinn mechanism down to Earth
    Davoudiasl, Hooman
    Schnubel, Marvin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 110 (07)
  • [29] Axion production via trapped misalignment from Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking
    Di Luzio, Luca
    Sorensen, Philip
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2024, (10):
  • [30] Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking via asymptotically safe dynamical scalegenesis: a walking axicolor and axion
    Ishida, Hiroyuki
    Matsuzaki, Shinya
    Peng, Xiao-Chang
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2022, 82 (02):