Acute appendicitis and pregnancy: diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging

被引:4
作者
Badr, Dominique A. [1 ,2 ]
Selsabil, Mohammed-Hadj [3 ]
Thill, Viviane [4 ]
Dobos, Sebastian [4 ]
Ostrovska, Adela [1 ,2 ]
Jani, Jacques C. [1 ,2 ]
Cannie, Mieke M. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Univ Hosp Brugmann, Dept Obstet, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Univ Hosp Brugmann, Dept Gynecol, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Univ Hosp Brugmann, Dept Radiol, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Univ Hosp Brugmann, Dept Abdominal Thorac & Laparoscop Surg, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Radiol, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Acute appendicitis; magnetic resonance imaging; pregnancy; sensitivity; specificity; ultrasound; SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS; ULTRASOUND; MRI;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2021.1961730
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women. Methods The study was conducted in 2 referral centers in Brussels, Belgium, between March 1st 2009 and January 31st 2017. Pregnant women who presented with abdominal pain and underwent MRI were included. Baseline characteristics, clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound test results were extracted retrospectively from the electronic medical charts. MRI exams were prospectively reevaluated by an experienced radiologist blinded to patient outcome and MRI findings. Visualization of the appendix and assessment of gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and vascular systems were recorded. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed by pathology exam. Results In total, 85 patients were included. The appendix was identified in all patients on MRI and acute appendicitis was suspected in 7. The diagnosis was confirmed in 6 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI were 100% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 54.1%-100%), 98.7% (95% CI: 93.2-99.9%), 85.7% (95% CI: 46.1-97.7%), and 100%, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the combination of clinical exam, laboratory findings and/or ultrasound were 100% (95% CI: 54.1%-100%), 62% (95% CI: 50.4-72.7%), 16.7% (95% CI: 13.1-20.96%), and 100%, respectively. Conclusion MRI is reliable in confirming or excluding acute appendicitis during pregnancy, with a rate of visualization of the appendix approaching 100%. Efforts should be focused on the implementation of MRI as a first-line imaging exam in the workup of suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:8107 / 8110
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Appendicitis in pregnancy: Diagnosis, management and complications [J].
Andersen, B ;
Nielsen, TF .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 78 (09) :758-762
[2]   Uterine body placenta accreta spectrum: A detailed literature review [J].
Badr, Dominique A. ;
Al Hassan, Jihad ;
Wehbe, Georges Salem ;
Ramadan, Mohamad K. .
PLACENTA, 2020, 95 :44-52
[3]   SONOGRAPHY OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS IN PREGNANCY [J].
BARLOON, TJ ;
BROWN, BP ;
ABUYOUSEF, MM ;
WARNOCK, N ;
BERBAUM, KS .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1995, 20 (02) :149-151
[4]   Potential Heating Effect in the Gravid Uterus by Using 3-T MR Imaging Protocols: Experimental Study in Miniature Pigs [J].
Cannie, Mieke M. ;
De Keyzer, Frederik ;
Van Laere, Sigrid ;
Leus, Astrid ;
de Mey, Johan ;
Fourneau, Catherine ;
De Ridder, Filip ;
Van Cauteren, Toon ;
Willekens, Inneke ;
Jani, Jacques C. .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 279 (03) :754-761
[5]   A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis [J].
Duke, Eugene ;
Kalb, Bobby ;
Arif-Tiwari, Hina ;
Daye, Zhongyin John ;
Gilbertson-Dahdal, Dorothy ;
Keim, Samuel M. ;
Martin, Diego R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (03) :508-517
[6]   The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Suspected Appendicitis in Pregnancy Shortened Length of Stay Without Increase in Hospital Charges [J].
Fonseca, Annabelle L. ;
Schuster, Kevin M. ;
Kaplan, Lewis J. ;
Maung, Adrian A. ;
Lui, Felix Y. ;
Davis, Kimberly A. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (07) :687-693
[7]   MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy [J].
Israel, Gary M. ;
Malguria, Nagina ;
McCarthy, Shirley ;
Copel, Josh ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 28 (02) :428-433
[8]   Pregnancy and appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical use of MRI in diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women [J].
Kave, Mania ;
Parooie, Fateme ;
Salarzaei, Morteza .
WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2019, 14 (1)
[9]   Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy [J].
Bruce E. Lehnert ;
Joel A. Gross ;
Ken F. Linnau ;
Mariam Moshiri .
Emergency Radiology, 2012, 19 (4) :293-299
[10]   Evaluating the Acute Abdomen in the Pregnant Patient [J].
Masselli, Gabriele ;
Derme, Martina ;
Laghi, Francesca ;
Framarino-dei-Malatesta, Marialuisa ;
Gualdi, Gianfranco .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 53 (06) :1309-+