Application of risk analysis in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector: An overview

被引:79
作者
Animah, Isaac [1 ]
Shafiee, Mahmood [2 ]
机构
[1] Reg Maritime Univ, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Accra, Ghana
[2] Cranfield Univ, Dept Energy & Power, Cranfield, Beds, England
关键词
Liquefied natural gas (LNG); Hazard identification; Risk analysis; Risk assessment; Data sources; FAULT-TREE ANALYSIS; IMPROVE PROCESS SAFETY; FAILURE MODE; EVENT-TREE; CRITICALITY ANALYSIS; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; FLOATING STORAGE; ALARM DATABASES; FUZZY; FIRE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103980
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In recent years, the global demand for liquefied natural gas (LNG) as an energy source is increasing at a very fast rate. In order to meet this demand, a large number of facilities such as platforms, FPSO (floating production, storage and offloading), FSRU (floating storage and regasification unit) and LNG ships and terminals are required for the storage, processing and transportation of LNG. Failure of any of these facilities may expose the market, companies, personnel and the environment to hazards, hence making the application of risk analysis to the LNG sector a very topical issue throughout the world. To assess the risk of accidents associated with LNG facilities and carriers, various risk analysis approaches have been employed to identify the potential hazards, calculate the probability of accidents, as well as assessing the severity of consequences. Nonetheless, literature on classification of the risk analysis models applied to LNG facilities is very limited. Therefore, to reveal the holistic issues and future perspectives on risk analysis of LNG facilities, a systematic review of the current state-of-the-art research on LNG risk analysis is necessary. The aim of this paper is to review and categorize the published literature about the problems associated with risk analysis of LNG facilities, so as to improve the understanding of stakeholders (researchers, regulators, and practitioners). To achieve this aim, scholarly articles on LNG risk analysis are identified, reviewed, and then categorized according to risk assessment methods (qualitative, semi-qualitative or quantitative; deterministic or probabilistic; conventional or dynamic), tools (ETA, FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Bayesian network), output/strategy (RBI, RBM, RBIM, facility siting, etc.), data sources (OREDA handbook, published literature, UK HSE databases, regulatory agencies' reports, industry datasets, and experts' consultations), applications (LNG carriers and LNG fuelled ships, LNG terminals and stations, LNG offshore floating units, LNG plants), etc. Our study will not only be useful to researchers engaged in these areas but will also assist regulators, policy makers, and operators of LNG facilities to find the risk analysis models that fit their specific requirements.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 132 条
  • [1] Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling
    Abimbola, Majeed
    Khan, Faisal
    Khakzad, Nima
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2014, 30 : 74 - 85
  • [2] The risk analysis by failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and fuzzy-FMEA of supercritical water gasification system used in the sewage sludge treatment
    Adar, Elanur
    Ince, Mahir
    Karatop, Buket
    Bilgili, Mehmet Sinan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (01): : 1261 - 1268
  • [3] A risk-based availability estimation using Markov method
    Ahmed, Qadeer
    Khan, Faisal
    Raza, Syed
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (02) : 106 - +
  • [4] Fuzzy-based failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of a hybrid molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) and gas turbine system for marine propulsion
    Ahn, Junkeon
    Noh, Yeelyong
    Park, Sung Ho
    Choi, Byung Il
    Chang, Daejun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2017, 364 : 226 - 233
  • [5] AIChE, 2001, LAYER PROTECTION ANA
  • [6] Assessment of domino effect: State of the art and research Needs
    Amos, Necci
    Cozzani, Valerio
    Spadoni, Gigliola
    Khan, Faisal
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 143 : 3 - 18
  • [7] Integrated risk assessment for LNG terminals
    Aneziris, O. N.
    Papazoglou, I. A.
    Konstantinidou, M.
    Nivolianitou, Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2014, 28 : 23 - 35
  • [8] Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI regulation 14 by ships in the Gulf of Guinea sub-region: Issues, challenges and opportunities
    Animah, Isaac
    Addy-Lamptey, Augustus
    Korsah, Francis
    Sackey, John Simon
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 62 : 441 - 455
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2010, P 11 INT S PRACT DES
  • [10] [Anonymous], INT J ENV RES PUBLIC