Cephalad movement of morphine and fentanyl in humans after intrathecal injection

被引:35
作者
Eisenach, JC
Hood, DD
Curry, R
Shafer, SL
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Study Pharmacol Plastic Presence Pain, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200307000-00027
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Despite decades of use, controversy remains regarding the extent and time course of cephalad spread of opioids in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after intrathecal injection. The purpose of this study was to examine differences between two often used opioids, morphine and fentanyl, in distribution in the CSF after intrathecal injection. Methods: Eight healthy volunteers received intrathecal injection of morphine (50 mug) plus fentanyl (50 mug) at a lower lumbar interspace. CSF was sampled through a needle in an upper lumbar interspace for 60-120 min. At the end of this time, a sample was taken from the lower lumbar needle, and both needles were withdrawn. CSF volume was determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed with NONMEM. Results: Morphine and fentanyl peaked in CSF at the cephalad needle at similar times (41 +/- 13 min for fentanyl, 57 +/- 12 min for morphine). The ratio of morphine to fentanyl in CSF at the cephalad needle increased with time, surpassing 2:1 by 36 min and 4:1 by 103 min. CSF concentrations did not correlate with weight, height, or lumbosacral CSF volume. The concentrations of morphine and fentanyl at both sampling sites were well described by a simple pharmacokinetic model. The individual model parameters did not correlate with the distance between the needles, CSF volume, patient height, or patient weight. Conclusions. Fentanyl is cleared more rapidly from CSF than morphine, although their initial distribution in the first hour after injection does not differ greatly. The pharmacokinetic model demonstrates that mixing is the primary determinant of early concentrations and is highly variable among individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 173
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and relation with blood flow -: A magnetic resonance study with semiautomated cerebrospinal fluid segmentation [J].
Balédent, O ;
Henry-Feugeas, MCC ;
Idy-Peretti, I .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2001, 36 (07) :368-377
[2]   Cerebrospinal fluid pulsation amplitude and its quantitative relationship to cerebral blood flow pulsations: A phase-contrast MR flow imaging study [J].
Bhadelia, RA ;
Bogdan, AR ;
Kaplan, RF ;
Wolpert, SM .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1997, 39 (04) :258-264
[3]   ROSTRAL SPREAD OF EPIDURAL MORPHINE [J].
BROMAGE, PR ;
CAMPORESI, EM ;
DURANT, PAC ;
NIELSEN, CH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1982, 56 (06) :431-436
[4]   EPIDURAL NARCOTICS IN VOLUNTEERS - SENSITIVITY TO PAIN AND TO CARBON-DIOXIDE [J].
BROMAGE, PR ;
CAMPORESI, E ;
LESLIE, J .
PAIN, 1980, 9 (02) :145-160
[5]   Lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume is the primary determinant of sensory block extent and duration during spinal anesthesia [J].
Carpenter, RL ;
Hogan, QH ;
Liu, SS ;
Crane, B ;
Moore, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (01) :24-29
[6]  
COUSINS MJ, 1984, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V61, P276
[7]   INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL COMPARED TO EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE FOR LABOR ANALGESIA [J].
DANGELO, R ;
ANDERSON, MT ;
PHILIP, J ;
EISENACH, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (06) :1209-1215
[8]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF FENTANYL IN LUMBAR AND CERVICAL CSF FOLLOWING LUMBAR EPIDURAL AND INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION [J].
GOURLAY, GK ;
MURPHY, TM ;
PLUMMER, JL ;
KOWALSKI, SR ;
CHERRY, DA ;
COUSINS, MJ .
PAIN, 1989, 38 (03) :253-259
[9]   Origin of subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid pulsations: a phase-contrast MR analysis [J].
Henry-Feugeas, MC ;
Idy-Peretti, I ;
Baledent, O ;
Poncelet-Didon, A ;
Zannoli, G ;
Bittoun, J ;
Schouman-Claeys, E .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 18 (04) :387-395
[10]  
LEIGHTON BL, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V69, P122