Interpreting a 750 GeV diphoton resonance

被引:25
作者
Gupta, Rick S. [1 ]
Jager, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Kats, Yevgeny [1 ]
Perez, Gilad [1 ]
Stamou, Emmanuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Weizmann Inst Sci, Dept Particle Phys & Astrophys, IL-7610001 Rehovot, Israel
[2] Univ Sussex, Dept Phys & Astron, Brighton BN1 9QH, E Sussex, England
来源
JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS | 2016年 / 07期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics; Supersymmetric Standard Model; HIGGS; BREAKING; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/JHEP07(2016)145
中图分类号
O412 [相对论、场论]; O572.2 [粒子物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
We discuss the implications of the significant excesses in the diphoton final state observed by the LHC experiments ATLAS and CMS around a diphoton invariant mass of 750 GeV. The interpretation of the excess as a spin-zero s-channel resonance implies model-independent lower bounds on both its branching ratio and its coupling to photons, which stringently constrain dynamical models. We consider both the case where the excess is described by a narrow and a broad resonance. We also obtain model-independent constraints on the allowed couplings and branching fractions to final states other than diphotons, by including the interplay with 8 TeV searches. These results can guide attempts to construct viable dynamical models of the resonance. Turning to specific models, our findings suggest that the anomaly cannot be accounted for by the presence of only an additional singlet or doublet spin-zero field and the Standard Model degrees of freedom; this includes all two-Higgs-doublet models. Likewise, heavy scalars in the MSSM cannot explain the excess if stability of the electroweak vacuum is required, at least in a leading-order analysis. If we assume that the resonance is broad we find that it is challenging to find a weakly coupled explanation. However, we provide an existence proof in the form of a model with vectorlike quarks with large electric charge that is perturbative up to the 100 TeV scale. For the narrow-resonance case a similar model can be perturbative up to high scales also with smaller charges. We also find that, in their simplest form, dilaton models cannot explain the size of the excess. Some implications for flavor physics are briefly discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interpreting a 750 GeV diphoton resonance
    Rick S. Gupta
    Sebastian Jäger
    Yevgeny Kats
    Gilad Perez
    Emmanuel Stamou
    Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016
  • [2] 750 GeV diphoton resonance and inflation
    Hamada, Yuta
    Noumi, Toshifumi
    Shiu, Gary
    Sun, Sichun
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2016, 93 (12)
  • [3] Measuring the Diphoton Coupling of a 750 GeV Resonance
    Fichet, S.
    von Gersdorff, G.
    Royon, C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2016, 116 (23)
  • [4] Promising interpretation of diphoton resonance at 750 GeV
    Bi, Xiao-Jun
    Ding, Ran
    Fan, Yizhou
    Huang, Li
    Li, Chuang
    Li, Tianjun
    Raza, Shabbar
    Wang, Xiao-Chuan
    Zhu, Bin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2016, 94 (01)
  • [5] Interpreting the 750 GeV diphoton excess in the minimal dilaton model
    Cao, Junjie
    Shang, Liangliang
    Su, Wei
    Zhang, Yang
    Zhu, Jinya
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C, 2016, 76 (05):
  • [6] Diphoton resonance at 750 GeV in the broken R-symmetric MSSM
    Chakraborty, Sabyasachi
    Chakraborty, Amit
    Raychaudhuri, Sreerup
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2016, 94 (03)
  • [7] On a possible large width 750 GeV diphoton resonance at ATLAS and CMS
    Aloni, Daniel
    Blum, Kfir
    Dery, Avital
    Efrati, Aielet
    Nir, Yosef
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2016, (08):
  • [8] On a possible large width 750 GeV diphoton resonance at ATLAS and CMS
    Daniel Aloni
    Kfir Blum
    Avital Dery
    Aielet Efrati
    Yosef Nir
    Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016
  • [9] How resonance-continuum interference changes 750 GeV diphoton excess: signal enhancement and peak shift
    Jung, Sunghoon
    Song, Jeonghyeon
    Yoon, Yeo Woong
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2016, (05):
  • [10] Top-phobic heavy Higgs boson as the 750 GeV diphoton resonance
    Kang, Sin Kyu
    Song, Jeonghyeon
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2016, 93 (11)