Clinical impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with optimized myocardial scar detection in patients with cardiac implantable devices

被引:29
作者
Bhuva, Anish N. [1 ,2 ]
Kellman, Peter [3 ]
Graham, Adam [4 ]
Ramlall, Manish [1 ]
Boubertakh, Redha [1 ]
Feuchter, Patricia [1 ]
Hawkins, Angela [4 ]
Lowe, Martin [4 ]
Lambiase, Pier D. [2 ,4 ]
Sekhri, Neha [1 ]
Schilling, Richard J. [4 ]
Moon, James C. [1 ,2 ]
Manisty, Charlotte H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiovasc Imaging, London, England
[2] UCL, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, London, England
[3] NIH, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiac Electrophysiol, London, England
关键词
Pacemaker; Defibrillator; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Wideband; Late gadolinium enhancement; Fibrosis; UNITED-STATES; PACEMAKERS; ASSOCIATION; CARDIOLOGY; PROTOCOL; SOCIETY; SAFETY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Myocardial scar assessment using late gadolinium enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (LGE CMR) is commonly indicated for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), however metal artifact can degrade images. We evaluated the clinical impact of LGE CMR incorporating a device-dependent metal artifact reduction strategy in patients with (LEDs. Methods: 136 CMR studies were performed in 133 consecutive patients (age 56 +/- 19 years, 69% male) with CIEDs (22% implantable loop recorders [ILRs], 40% permanent pacemakers [PPMs], 38% implantable cardioverter defibrillators [ICDs]; 42% non-MRI conditional) over 2 years, without complication. LGE imaging was tailored to the CIED, using a wideband sequence for left-sided PPMs and ICDs and conventional sequences for ILRs and right-sided PPMs, scoring segmental aitifact. Diagnostic utility and impact on clinical management were scored by consensus of experts. Resulis: CMR provided unexpected diagnoses in 22 (16%) and changed management in 113 (83%) patients. Myocardial scar was present in 92 (68%), with other abnormalities detected in another 13%. Using conventional LGE, 43 (32%) studies were non-diagnostic (79% of defibrillators) compared to 0% using wideband LGE imaging. Wideband LGE results changed clinical management in an additional 39 (75%) defibrillator patients and 10 (19%) pacemaker patients when compared to imaging with conventional LGE sequences. Conclusion: The clinical yield from CMR using optimized LGE sequences in patients with CIEDs is high with no demonstrated clinical risk. A device-dependent LGE imaging strategy using wideband LGE is needed to achieve clinical utility especially in LCD recipients. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 78
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the right heart using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices
    Loebe, S.
    Paetsch, I
    Hilbert, S.
    Spampinato, R.
    Oebel, S.
    Richter, S.
    Doering, M.
    Sommer, P.
    Bollmann, A.
    Hindricks, G.
    Jahnke, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 316 : 266 - 271
  • [32] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Challenges and Solutions
    Rajiah, Prabhakar
    Kay, Fernando
    Bolen, Michael
    Patel, Amit R.
    Landeras, Luis
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2020, 35 (01) : W1 - W17
  • [33] Synthetic late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance for diagnosing myocardial scar
    Abdula, Goran
    Nickander, Jannike
    Sorensson, Peder
    Lundin, Magnus
    Kellman, Peter
    Sigfridsson, Andreas
    Ugander, Martin
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2018, 52 (03) : 127 - 132
  • [34] Impact of wideband cardiac magnetic resonance on diagnosis, decision-making and outcomes in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Patel, Hena N.
    Wang, Shuo
    Rao, Swati
    Singh, Amita
    Landeras, Luis
    Besser, Stephanie A.
    Carter, Spencer
    Mishra, Satish
    Nishimura, Takuro
    Shatz, Dalise Y.
    Tung, Roderick
    Nayak, Hemal
    Kawaji, Keigo
    Mor-Avi, Victor
    Patel, Amit R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2023, 24 (02) : 181 - 189
  • [35] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study
    Yadava, Mrinal
    Nugent, Matthew
    Krebsbach, Angela
    Minnier, Jessica
    Jessel, Peter
    Henrikson, Charles A.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 50 (01) : 95 - 104
  • [36] Viewpoint: Cardiac implantable electronic devices and magnetic resonance compatibility: was it really necessary?
    Sutton, Richard
    Benditt, David G.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 55 (02) : 125 - 127
  • [37] Is diversity harmful?-Mixed-brand cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Koenig, Christoph Alexander
    Tinhofer, Florian
    Puntus, Thomas
    Burger, Achim Leo
    Neubauer, Nikolaus
    Langenberger, Herbert
    Huber, Kurt
    Nuernberg, Michael
    Zweiker, David
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2022, 134 (7-8) : 286 - 293
  • [38] Wideband black-blood late gadolinium enhancement imaging for improved myocardial scar assessment in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Gut, Pauline
    Cochet, Hubert
    Caluori, Guido
    El-Hamrani, Dounia
    Constantin, Marion
    Vlachos, Konstantinos
    Sridi, Soumaya
    Antiochos, Panagiotis
    Schwitter, Juerg
    Masi, Ambra
    Sacher, Frederic
    Jais, Pierre
    Stuber, Matthias
    Bustin, Aurelien
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2024, 92 (05) : 1851 - 1866
  • [39] Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and abandoned or epicardial leads: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meier, Claudia
    Israel, Carsten
    Eisenblaetter, Michel
    Hoyer, Annika
    Stoye, Ferdinand Valentin
    Yilmaz, Ali
    Gielen, Stephan
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (06):
  • [40] Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices with generator and lead(s) brand mismatch
    Minaskeian, Nareg
    Hajnal, Sofia P.
    Liu, Michael B.
    Klooster, Lindsay M.
    Devick, Katrina L.
    Schwartz, Linda
    Jokerst, Clinton E.
    Sorajja, Dan
    Scott, Luis R. P.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (03):