共 32 条
Evaluation of an architecture for intelligent query and exploration of time-oriented clinical data
被引:34
作者:
Martins, Susana B.
[2
,3
]
Shahar, Yuval
[1
]
Goren-Bar, Dina
[1
]
Galperin, Maya
[1
]
Kaizer, Herbert
[2
]
Basso, Lawrence V.
[2
]
McNaughton, Deborah
[2
]
Goldstein, Mary K.
[2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Informat Syst Engn, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Primary Care & Outcomes Res, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Ctr Geriatr Res Educ & Clin, Palo Alto, CA USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
medical informatics;
clinical decision-support systems;
human-computer interface;
information-visualization;
knowledge-based systems;
temporal reasoning;
intelligent user interfaces;
D O I:
10.1016/j.artmed.2008.03.006
中图分类号:
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号:
081104 ;
0812 ;
0835 ;
1405 ;
摘要:
Objective: Evaluate KNAVE-II, a knowledge-based framework for visualization, interpretation, and exploration of longitudinal clinical data, clinical concepts and patterns. KNAVE-II mediates queries to a distributed temporal-abstraction architecture(IDAN), which uses a knowledge-based problem-solving method specializing in on-the-fly computation of clinical queries. Methods: A two-phase, balanced cross-over study to compare efficiency and satisfaction of a group of clinicians when answering queries of variable complexity about time-oriented clinical data, typical for oncology protocols, using KNAVE-II, versus standard methods: both paper charts and a popular electronic spreadsheet (ESS) in Phase 1; an ESS in Phase II. The measurements included the time required to answer and the correctness of answer for each query and each complexity category, and for all queries, assessed versus a predetermined gold standard set by a domain expert. User satisfaction was assessed by the Standard Usability Score (SUS) tool-specific questionnaire and by a "Usability of Toot Comparison" comparative questionnaire developed for this study. Results: In both evaluations, subjects answered higher-complexity queries significantly faster using KNAVE-II than when using paper charts or an ESS up to a mean of 255 s difference per query versus the ESS for hard queries (p = 0.0003) in the second evaluation. Average correctness scores when using KNAVE-II versus paper charts, in the first phase, and the ESS, in the second phase, were significantly higher over all queries. In the second evaluation, 91.6% (110/120) of all of the questions asked within queries of all levels produced correct answers using KNAVE-II, opposed to only 57.5% (69/120) using the ESS (p < 0.0001). User satisfaction with KNAVE-II was significantly superior compared to using either a paper chart or the ESS (p = 0.006). Clinicians ranked KNAVE-II superior to both paper and the ESS. Conclusions: An evaluation of the functionality and usability of KNAVE-II and its supporting knowledge-based temporal-mediation architecture has produced highly encouraging results regarding saving of physician time, enhancement of accuracy of clinical assessment, and user satisfaction. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 34
页数:18
相关论文