FRoG-A New Calculation Engine for Clinical Investigations with Proton and Carbon Ion Beams at CNAO

被引:37
作者
Choi, KyungDon [1 ,2 ]
Mein, Stewart B. [3 ,4 ]
Kopp, Benedikt [4 ,5 ]
Magro, Giuseppe [1 ]
Molinelli, Silvia [1 ]
Ciocca, Mario [1 ]
Mairani, Andrea [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Nazl Adroterapia Oncol, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[2] Pavia Univ, Dept Phys, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Phys, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] German Canc Res Ctr, Imaging & Radiat Oncol, D-69210 Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ Clin, Radiat Oncol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Ctr HIT, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
hadrontherapy; treatment planning; biological dose; MKM; LEM; FRoG; GPU; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; TREATMENT PLANNING TOOL; SCANNED PROTON; DOSE CALCULATION; BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DOSIMETRIC VERIFICATION; NATIONAL CENTER; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/cancers10110395
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A fast and accurate dose calculation engine for hadrontherapy is critical for both routine clinical and advanced research applications. FRoG is a graphics processing unit (GPU)-based forward calculation tool developed at CNAO (Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica) and at HIT (Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center) for fast and accurate calculation of both physical and biological dose. FRoG calculation engine adopts a triple Gaussian parameterization for the description of the lateral dose distribution. FRoG provides dose, dose-averaged linear energy transfer, and biological dose-maps, -profiles, and -volume-histograms. For the benchmark of the FRoG calculation engine, using the clinical settings available at CNAO, spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs) and patient cases for both proton and carbon ion beams have been calculated and compared against FLUKA Monte Carlo (MC) predictions. In addition, FRoG patient-specific quality assurance (QA) has been performed for twenty-five proton and carbon ion fields. As a result, for protons, biological dose values, using a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1, agree on average with MC within similar to 1% for both SOBPs and patient plans. For carbon ions, RBE-weighted dose (D-RBE) agreement against FLUKA is within similar to 2.5% for the studied SOBPs and patient plans. Both MKM (Microdosimetric Kinetic Model) and LEM (Local Effect Model) D-RBE are implemented and tested in FRoG to support the NIRS (National Institute of Radiological Sciences)-based to LEM-based biological dose conversion. FRoG matched the measured QA dosimetric data within similar to 2.0% for both particle species. The typical calculation times for patients ranged from roughly 1 to 4 min for proton beams and 3 to 6 min for carbon ions on a NVIDIA((R)) GeForce((R)) GTX 1080 Ti. This works demonstrates FRoG's potential to bolster clinical activity with proton and carbon ion beams at CNAO.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   The FLUKA Code: An Accurate Simulation Tool For Particle Therapy [J].
Battistoni, Giuseppe ;
Bauer, Julia ;
Boehlen, Till T. ;
Cerutti, Francesco ;
Chin, Mary P. W. ;
Augusto, Ricardo Dos Santos ;
Ferrari, Alfredo ;
Ortega, Pablo G. ;
Kozlowska, Wioletta ;
Magro, Giuseppe ;
Mairani, Andrea ;
Parodi, Katia ;
Sala, Paola R. ;
Schoofs, Philippe ;
Tessonnier, Thomas ;
Vlachoudis, Vasilis .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 6
[2]   Integration and evaluation of automated Monte Carlo simulations in the clinical practice of scanned proton and carbon ion beam therapy [J].
Bauer, J. ;
Sommerer, F. ;
Mairani, A. ;
Unholtz, D. ;
Farook, R. ;
Handrack, J. ;
Frey, K. ;
Marcelos, T. ;
Tessonnier, T. ;
Ecker, S. ;
Ackermann, B. ;
Ellerbrock, M. ;
Debus, J. ;
Parodi, K. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (16) :4635-4659
[3]   The FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for High Energy and Medical Applications [J].
Boehlen, T. T. ;
Cerutti, F. ;
Chin, M. P. W. ;
Fosso, A. ;
Ferrari, A. ;
Ortega, P. G. ;
Mairani, A. ;
Sala, P. R. ;
Smirnov, G. ;
Vlachoudisl, V. .
NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS, 2014, 120 :211-214
[4]   ROOT - An object oriented data analysis framework [J].
Brun, R ;
Rademakers, F .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1997, 389 (1-2) :81-86
[5]   Accelerated ray tracing for radiotherapy dose calculations on a GPU [J].
de Greef, M. ;
Crezee, J. ;
van Eijk, J. C. ;
Pool, R. ;
Bel, A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (09) :4095-4102
[6]  
Ferrari A., CERN200510
[7]   Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: a planning study to compare NIRS and LEM approaches with a clinically-oriented strategy [J].
Fossati, Piero ;
Molinelli, Silvia ;
Matsufuji, Naruhiru ;
Ciocca, Mario ;
Mirandola, Alfredo ;
Mairani, Andrea ;
Mizoe, Junetsu ;
Hasegawa, Azusa ;
Imai, Reiko ;
Kamada, Tadashi ;
Orecchia, Roberto ;
Tsujii, Hirohiko .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (22) :7543-7554
[8]   Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios [J].
Giovannini, Giulia ;
Boehlen, Till ;
Cabal, Gonzalo ;
Bauer, Julia ;
Tessonnier, Thomas ;
Frey, Kathrin ;
Debus, Juergen ;
Mairani, Andrea ;
Parodi, Katia .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
[9]   The heidelberg ion therapy center [J].
Haberer, T ;
Debus, J ;
Eickhoff, H ;
Jäkel, O ;
Schulz-Ertner, D ;
Weber, U .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 :S186-S190
[10]   A trichrome beam model for biological dose calculation in scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy treatment planning [J].
Inaniwa, T. ;
Kanematsu, N. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (01) :437-451